Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-4811793-20130620230822/@comment-10658895-20130624190101

186.55.50.15 wrote: 174.49.208.85 wrote: ALRIGHT, THAT'S IT. Spyder, I don't know you, but from what I've read you have been very very helpful. Anons like you shouldn't be excluded from posting. All you people who are celebrating the exclusion of Anons, that isn't very nice. All those 'Anons vandalize the most', 'Anons are annoying', and 'Try to find something where Anons were helpful' things are lies, in my opinion. The CPW needs Anons. I'm with you man, not all the anons are bad, listen to Michael Jackson (it starts Bad) because we aren't bad, anons aren't bad, you know it, we aren't bad, lala, you know it, we aren't bad, only someones, lala, you know it, we aren't bad, (a part I don't remember) who's bad? I sort of agree slightly with both of these comments, but... really? Getting rid of anons means a lot less vandals, less people cursing, and more recognizable people. Remembering a specific bunch of numbers is hard.