Club Penguin Wiki:Demotion Project

The Demotion Project is a place where any user can vote on users to be demoted.

Rules and how to nominate


 * Rules


 * You cannot vote for or against yourself.
 * You cannot tell other users to vote for or against someone, including yourself if you are nominated.
 * You must have made at least 50 mainspace edits.
 * A user that was nominated for demotion cannot be nominated again in the following month.
 * A vote closes after 2 weeks.
 * How to nominate a user


 * 1) Contact an admin and mention the nominee's username. Tell the admin why you believe a demotion should be done.
 * 2) This admin will then confirm whether it's a reason for demotion. If possible, it's also recommended that 2 admins will confirm it.
 * Nominating

To nominate, paste the following text in the bottom of the page and fill in the parameters

(0)

 * Nominated by and confirmed by 

Comments

 *  - the nominee for demotion.
 *  - the name of the person that requested the demotion.
 * - the name of the confirming admin(s).
 *  - the reason for demotion.
 * Voting

Vote under the "For" section if you want to vote for, and sign under the "Against" section if you vote against. Signing is done by adding to the bottom of the list of votes: #~ Your signature must contain your user name and/or a link to your use page (or user talk or contributions).

Remember to change the number of votes in the heading when voting.

Please vote under this line

Watatsuki (-2)

 * Nominated by Lord Sir Guilmon Digital Monster XIXVI and confirmed by Callum Fawsitt
 * (Vote ends February 18)

He has a problem with his moderating, e.g: kicking, banning, blocking. The way he treats users and disrespects them at times. The way he is to the community and refuses to support users in things they're struggling with particularly editing. The way he makes people feel bad and lowers their confidence because they aren't as good as him at editing and other things. He sometimes breaks some of the chat rules by roleplaying with certain users, and when they join in with them, he kicks them despite doing it himself. He kicks people for things when they only need to receive a warning particularly abbreviating a swear word.

For (5)

 * 23:48, February 4, 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Phineas99PuffleParty2015CustomPenguin.png Me   Eat   all your cakes!  9th_Anniversary_Party_Cake.png 16:55, February 5, 2016 (UTC)
 * 2) Have you noticed everybody&#39;s being super nice? (talk) 19:32, February 5, 2016 (UTC)
 * 3) RafaelMoutaCP (talk) 23:03, February 5, 2016 (UTC)

Against (7)

 * 06:35, February 5, 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Greece_Flag.png Samantas5855 (    talk    )  15:41, February 5, 2016 (UTC)
 * 2) User:Matthew.fitzgerald.16 18:12 February 5, 2016 (GMT)
 * 3) —Vicyorus (talk) 19:52, February 5, 2016 (UTC)
 * 4) P.H. CP (talk) 21:29, February 5, 2016 (UTC)
 * 5) Jeserator   H T  T R  !   Football Pin.PNG 02:08, February 6, 2016 (UTC)
 * 6) Surprised Emoticon.png You know it is CustardTheFreeBird Clothing Icons 5429.png 12:15, February 7, 2016 (UTC)

Comments
"apparently people let him spam the wiki activity with undos" - If you don't want him to "spam" wiki activity with undos, don't spam wiki activity with bad edits. "Saying that Kermit the Frog isn't a frog is genius." - ... Okay then. That doesn't hold any relevance here and was never even said by him, so I'm not sure why that's in your comment. "And because he created a quote wiki based on Glitch, I find it rude." - Creating a wiki with lists of quotes isn't rude, nor is it relevant to his adminship here. "He got a user in trouble, having her blocked for a month but he gets blocked for a week, and the bureacrats promised he would be demoted for a week." - He did not get anyone in trouble. The user revealed personal information by her own choice. It was also her second offense, so she was blocked for a month. As for Watatsuki, it was his first offense, so he was blocked for a week. You can see those exact block times in the Privacy Policy. There is also nothing in the policy about permanent demotion as a consequence of that. -- 06:35, February 5, 2016 (UTC) "Only in my edits, not anyone else's. Those were old edits and all of a sudden he decided to revert them." - He was probably going through your contributions and fixing some of the other pointless edits you made earlier this year. "Saying catalogs are not catalogs, removing the interface category on interface pages." - I know that this may be a new concept for you, but there is something called category transclusion. What this means is that some categories are already added to a page through a template (usually between tags on the template page), so it's unnecessary to manually add that category to the page. In the case of the Catalogs category, it's the CatalogInfobox template that automatically adds the category. That's why Watatsuki was removing the category. As for the Interface category, he likely removed it by accident in a previous edit. As you can see here and here, he even kept that category. If you don't understand one of his edit summaries, just ask him before undoing the edit. I'm sure he's fine with explaining it to you if he hasn't already. "Not all of my 600 mainspace edits are bad. If you think I make bad edits, then I don't know what you consider good edits." - Correct, not all of them are bad. However, please try to convince me that these are good edits. You won't be able to. Your edit summary in this one is even "useless edit"... "He's going crazy." - I'd go crazy too if I had to revert so many of the silly edits you've been making over the past month in an attempt to gain rollback rights (which getting into multiple edit wars is definitely not helping, by the way). "And you said that he would also be demoted for a week, but hell you just promoted him back." - Yes, he was promoted back to an admin after being blocked and demoted for a week. What is your point? -- 01:42, February 6, 2016 (UTC)
 * Eh, he's been nominated before, he's been blocked recently, and apparently people let him spam the wiki activity with undos. Saying that Kermit the Frog isn't a frog is genius. I am expecting a bunch of supporters from him. I wouldn't be surprised if this vote didn't pass, it's favouritism. I hate to be what I was in the old days, but I'm a critic. And because he created a quote wiki based on Glitch, I find it rude. Glitch has autism and clearly Wata just is just quoting ting them and making fun of it. I'd love to see him in that. He got a user in trouble, having her blocked for a month but he gets blocked for a week, and the bureacrats promised he would be demoted for a week. Hell, Apj was like "ok I'll give u another chance ok I luv you :3" and, crap happened. 270-red-boxing-gloves-vector-image-free.png JONNN CENNAA!!! 270-red-boxing-gloves-vector-image-free.png 23:38, February 4, 2016 (UTC)
 * "I wouldn't be surprised if this vote didn't pass, it's favouritism." - You claim people vote against his demotion because of favoritism, yet you vote for his demotion because of your own irrational dislike of him? Sounds like hypocrisy.
 * I'm not voting for him because of my dislike for him. His actions, err I won't be whining about blocks or bans anymore like I used to. Any edit can be undone by him and stuff happened yesterday, when he undid almost every single edit of mine that were old that probably other admins or rollbacks looked at and approved. That Kermit the Frog thing was when I edited the page and added the category "frog", he undid it saying that's he's something else. He came up with a excuse in the summary and others also. Only in my edits, not anyone else's. Those were old edits and all of a sudden he decided to revert them. Saying catalogs are not catalogs, removing the interface category on interface pages.  Not all of my 600 mainspace edits are bad. If you think I make bad edits, then I don't know what you consider good edits. An admin can't undo a user's every edit and make up stuff. When I posted a reply on the Chat Complaints page, he reverted it. He's going crazy. As for the blocking thing, I'll agree with the time but also he  was the one who messaged Ember that picture. And you said that he would also be demoted for a week, but hell you just promoted him back. As I said before, he made a page on the quote wiki about Glitch's quotes and links them and sometimes imitates them because they are funny sometimes, but you have to remember he has autism. It's obnoxious you're making fun of his disability (nah bad word for it) or unable to type properly. Don't ask me why I'm complaining about this. This wouldn't be a big reason for him to be demoted. 270-red-boxing-gloves-vector-image-free.png JONNN CENNAA!!! 270-red-boxing-gloves-vector-image-free.png 11:58, February 5, 2016 (UTC)
 * "That Kermit the Frog thing was when I edited the page and added the category "frog", he undid it saying that's he's something else. He came up with a excuse in the summary and others also." - You're right, he did add a reason in the edit summary. Maybe you should process that reason in your mind for a few minutes before undoing it. Most of those edit summaries have validity, whether you choose to accept them or not.
 * So true! -- 23:48, February 4, 2016 (UTC)
 * Too immature for admin
 * What time frame is the vote description even referring to? A year ago? Looking at the kicks, chat bans, and blocks he's made recently (which aren't many), there isn't anything that shows he has a "problem with his moderating". As for how he treats other users, I agree that he could improve with that, but he isn't treating others badly enough to where he should be demoted. Otherwise, he certainly wouldn't have been an admin here for over a year already. I'd like to see actual proof of the claims made in the vote description. Until then, my vote is against. -- 06:35, February 5, 2016 (UTC)
 * Hey.you, this is the second time he's been nominated and this is by different people now. Don't you think there is a problem? 270-red-boxing-gloves-vector-image-free.png JONNN CENNAA!!! 270-red-boxing-gloves-vector-image-free.png 11:58, February 5, 2016 (UTC)
 * The problem is, how many of those people looked at any evidence of the claims made in the vote description before just taking the nominator's word for it? "He sometimes breaks some of the chat rules by roleplaying with certain users, and when they join in with them, he kicks them despite doing it himself. He kicks people for things when they only need to receive a warning particularly abbreviating a swear word." Why has nobody brought forward any proof of this? Until there is evidence, those are just empty claims. -- 01:42, February 6, 2016 (UTC)
 * Though I am quitting, I still "can" vote right? Randomly stopping by at the wiki and sees this and probably its a good time to say this. He have no problem with editing, I am pretty sure. And I dont care he's making another wiki to make fun this wiki user because I am talking about this wiki real problem "The way he makes people feel bad and lowers their confidence because they aren't as good as him at editing and other things." That's TRUE! Not just that though, he is very favoritism, picking on people, randomly kicks people with no reason and more. His attitude is very immature and childish. Since his reign as a admin, almost all people here doesn't care about this important thing, friendship to every single people, old or new! ALL THE TIME he does on chat is spreading his dolan "philosophy", randomly kicks people, bully new users instead welcoming them, acting like he is this wiki leader or king or the way you say it he acts like a dictator or Kim Jong Un. I think you should promote a admin not just by their edits, what about his/her attitude?!? Why are all admins defending her so much?!? Have you lost your mind or you all hypnotized by him? We won't report him for no reason you know? This is his second time nominated right? Are you still saying he is OK? I can't understand what the hell this wiki wants. This wiki wants more new users staying and active but your bad attitude just making them run away. You wants this wiki bigger and bigger, but your action making it smaller. This wiki just keep giving chance to a bad admin to stay and keep destroying our community. Also I dont like how he complaining about someone who his every single edit complained and mocked. Not just him though, there's others but he is the most notable one. I am doing everything to help this wiki from someone who wants to destroy this little community. I care about this wiki! I am still heartbroken from what he did to me. Demote Wata, Save CP wiki!Phineas99PuffleParty2015CustomPenguin.png Me   Eat   all your cakes!  9th_Anniversary_Party_Cake.png 16:55, February 5, 2016 (UTC)
 * Sorry, Watatsuki, but it's time you get demoted. So i'm all for this demotion. Not only did you be a dictator, but you banned me just for what I do best; Roleplaying! I know that RP is banned in this wiki (For now, at least. I'm still hoping that the RP rule gets abolished one day...), but I can't help it at times. It's just to remind the good ol' days of when I roleplayed. Of when we all roleplayed. I'm sorry, but it's time you get cut, Watat. You're through. Have you noticed everybody&#39;s being super nice? (talk) 19:32, February 5, 2016 (UTC)
 * One of your major reasons for voting is because he only banned you once for breaking the rules? I can't see anything wrong with that logic. \s —Vicyorus (talk) 19:52, February 5, 2016 (UTC)
 * You are kidding right? You want him demoted because he followed a policy? That's one of the dumbest things I've ever heard. It's like firing a cop for arresting someone.
 * So you think he should be demoted for banning you for something that's against the policy, even after he gave you many warnings? Please at least try to think of a better reason if you are going to vote in favor of his demotion. -- 01:42, February 6, 2016 (UTC)
 * I just love of how's there is fanboys everywhere who don't come on chat or check the logs or history. Now it seems as if Austin was forced to vote against. Random people everywhere. Hell, they wouldn't even know the situations. And of course, the admins are there always up by his side. :) It's kinda sad of how it's the administration who doesn't care but the community is. Sam was so desperate on removing this vote saying it's "invalid", but hell his rollback rights are invalid. It just amuses me that so many people complained about him. Just blind, new users who are just trolls or sockpuppets, and his ex-boyfriends. ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) 270-red-boxing-gloves-vector-image-free.png JONNN CENNAA!!! 270-red-boxing-gloves-vector-image-free.png 22:53, February 5, 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm afraid that your irrelevant, baseless rambling doesn't contribute much to your argument. Please provide examples from logs and page history that actually support your argument that he shouldn't have the rights. -- 01:42, February 6, 2016 (UTC)