Club Penguin Wiki:Vote Page

The Wiki's Vote Page is made to hold all kinds of votes.

When a vote is held, you will be allowed to sign your username, using four Tildes  ~

Each vote will be published in this way:

== (0)==

Suggested by and confirmed by 

===For (0)===

===Against (0)===

===Comments===

Nominee Notice: After being nominated, you can enter reasons on why you should be nominated next to the "nomination sentence". A vote closes when 14 days is up. The vote difference is calculated by the number of votes "for" subtracted by the number "against". The user option with the most vote differences wins.

Voter Notice: You must vote in either "For" or "Against". If you vote in for, you have to sign underneath the "For" heading. To do this you have to type this in:

#~

After you have signed it, you must change the number in the brackets up by 1. (e.g if it was at 3, it means 3 people have already signed it. Change it to 4 when you sign it.) This is also the same with the number by their name. If you vote for, you must also increase the number beside his or her name by 1.

Please remember to use "#" instead of the usual "*", because it numbers the votes making it easier to count them.

You can also remove your vote. If in any case you change your mind, do not remove your vote completely, just strike it out and move it to the back of the list.

Please discuss with an administrator before creating a new vote!

 Please create votes under this line: 

Merge Stamp articles into Stamp (-3)
Suggested by CK and confirmed by Jackninja5DipperGravityFalls

For (2)

 * 1)   Cp kid     Wazzup Wikia!    07:30, January 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) --&#123;&#123;SUBST:Template:BroSig&#125;&#125; (talk) 23:19, January 22, 2013 (UTC)

Against (5)

 * 1) No. Stamps are each an individual element, and as stated by someone below it would be messy to merge them all. I'd say keep it the way it is, or create one page for each category of stamps, so a Mascot Stamps page, a Card-Jitsu Stamps page, ect
 * 2) Gary3008 (talk) 15:42, January 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Me
 * 4) MeWaveMeNoSeeBigDino.png Ooga booga! Me 1joshuarules. You contact me here. Grub! 23:28, January 22, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) No. Absolutely no.-- WE'RE NOT GONNA TAKE IT. WE'RE NOT GONNA TAKE IT.  WE'RE NOT GONNA TAKE IT...ANYMORE! 21:24, January 24, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

 * I think all stamp articles can be merged into Stamp or List of Stamps because they are all such short articles. You could put all pertinent (good/useful) information on a large chart. There's no reason to say no just because of the article count, since articles are just articles, right?   Cp kid    Wazzup Wikia!    07:30, January 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * My Chart design   Cp kid    Wazzup Wikia!    18:35, January 21, 2013 (UTC)


 * I am not sure about this. I created those seperate articles because I am kinda afraid merging them all together into a single article would increase the page size dramatically, and thus decreasing page loading speed and efficiency. --Rowboat Pin.PNGtalk 08:37, January 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * Actually Dps, increasing the page size probably won't hurt that much, but if it does then we could just move them to separate smaller pages like suggested (Mascot Stamps, Card Jitsu stamps, etc.)   Cp kid    Wazzup Wikia!    17:55, January 21, 2013 (UTC)


 * Some stamps have some special properties/ extended information. A good example is the Trick-or-Treat stamp, that its icon and difficult level were changed. The Penguin Band stamps were also changed, and have been renamed. Articles like List of Stamps just cannot include so much detailed description. Penguin-Pal   (talk)  12:13, January 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * I understand. But I can make the page so that it'll accomodate all of that inofrmation without looking to messy. And also, if it did happen to look to long after I am done (pers-say), then we could probably do as that one person said about merging them into smaller stamp articles? Anyways i'm gonna make a rough draft chart and post it on your Wikia Chat to see what you think :)   Cp kid    Wazzup Wikia!    17:55, January 21, 2013 (UTC)


 * The page would be to long to read, and very messy. There should be a link to list of stamps on each individual stamp page, which I think there is. Me™ A Surprise™ 19:23, January 21, 2013 (UTC)

Disable Chat for 3 Days (0)
Suggested by Jackninja5DipperGravityFalls and confirmed by Hey.youcp

For (11)

 * 1) Hey.youcp
 * 2)   Cp kid     Wazzup Wikia!    07:30, January 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) SandorL (talk) 16:08, January 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) Orange Puffle Lover
 * 5) 123kitten1
 * 6) AnonymousDuckLover
 * 1) Orange Puffle Lover
 * 2) 123kitten1
 * 3) AnonymousDuckLover
 * 1) AnonymousDuckLover

Against (11)

 * 1) Rowboat Pin.PNGtalk 08:45, January 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Gary3008 (talk) 15:39, January 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Vicyorus (talk) 15:42, January 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) Starpuffle00 (talk) 16:14, January 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) WikiaFrog (User:talk:WikiaFrog|talk]]) Jan 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) --~ Lyra Heartstrings 16:20, January 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * 7) Rhysw2002
 * 8) Your Friend ¬.¬
 * 9) --FlagBahrain.svg Sdgsgfs ( T a l k ) 05:18, January 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 10) --Arsenal55702 (talk) 05:26, January 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 11) Once again, no.-- WE'RE NOT GONNA TAKE IT. WE'RE NOT GONNA TAKE IT.  WE'RE NOT GONNA TAKE IT...ANYMORE! 21:24, January 24, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

 * I know this may sound unappealing, but you may already know that recently there have been users complaining through blogs and quitting over arguments in chat. 3 days is not a long time, and it would be good to focus more on editing the wiki. Some users and I have been talking it over and we think a break from chat would be best so that things can cool down a little. Please consider this before voting, and comment with what you think. -- 06:59, January 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * I know I love the chat but this is the cause of dramas
 * We have also had a problem with users from other wikis coming on chat just to troll or just even try to get on everybody's nerves. This is happening almost EVERYDAY and I think the other Chat mods are becoming tired of it. -- 07:05, January 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * Enforce your quitting policy. It's on the policy page but it's not enforced? Doesn't make sense. --FlagCanada.svg Lord Master 96  07:16, January 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * Most users here just come here to chat, blog comment, or edit there userpage. We need to edit more. I dont mean Blogs and Userpages, I mean mainspace! This is a wiki, Guys, make it stay that way!


 * Sometime there isn't anything to edit, add, delte, ect. on mainspace pages. Me™ A Surprise™ 19:33, January 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * You guys can always go to the new wiki's IRC channel if chat is disabled here :) <font face="comic sans ms">  Cp kid    Wazzup Wikia!    07:30, January 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * LOL, thats a pretty good reason to disable chat (sarcastic) :P --Rowboat Pin.PNGtalk 08:58, January 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * Guys, don't you realize that disabling chat may potentially create even MORE drama? Users may complain not being able to interact with each other, and more drama and whining may result. Also, disabling that chat does NOT necessarily mean that people will edit more. Don't we remember the Party Policy? Does that policy, in aim to make users edit more, become successful? The best solution to the dramas, as said by Lordmaster, is enforcing the Quitting policy, not disabling chat. Even Disabling chat 3 days may mean that drama will go away, that is only for a short period of time, and drama will come back 3 days after. This is a wiki, and editing is not eveything. We meet new friends here, chat and get to know more about each other. Lastly, chat was disabled beforehand to prevent drama as well, but that did not work very well. I am against. --Rowboat Pin.PNGtalk 08:45, January 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * Originally I requested 1 week, Dps :P
 * Actually, drama must be stopped, I agree, but in my opinion, disabling chat is not the appropriate way to deal with it. Enforcing the policy is. While drama can be temporarily stopped in that three days time, no one can guarantee drama will not resume after that. Disabling chat may also result in side effects :P--Rowboat Pin.PNGtalk 08:52, January 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * Drama has been there since we founded the chat. Most commonly in 2012, and most of them had stupid reasons. I've noticed several useless dramas caused by Psaro, Footy etc. (No offence). We're trying what we can do, but disable chat can only stop dramas for 3 days, but I'm pretty sure that it'll work.
 * Well, mixer, even you said it yourself that "disabling chat can only stop dramas for 3 days". So, that isn't the solution to the drama. Mabye it will stop drama in short terms, but definitely not an ideal long-term solution to the problem. And, we tried disabling chat before, if you recall, but that did not work out too well ... --Rowboat Pin.PNGtalk 09:32, January 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * I dont see a reason why to disable the chat...SO COUNT ME IN!
 * I still think we should put a 100 edit limit to enter the Wikia... Vicyorus (talk) 15:44, January 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * That can't stop dramas though
 * To many people doing random stuff on chat instead of contributing to the wiki. This wiki used to have edit about every 30 seconds on average, and now it only has about an edit every 5 minutes on average (most of them comments or vandalism). I think the chat should be disabled for longer, but 3 days will work.
 * Again, disabling chat doesn't mean people will edit more. --Rowboat Pin.PNGtalk 13:44, January 22, 2013 (UTC)
 * DISABLING THE CHAT IS A STUPID IDEA AND EVEN IF WE DISABLE IT SO WE CAN "edit more" i dont THINK PEOPLE WILL EDIT I THINK THEY'LL JUST NOT GO ON THE WIKI!! YOUR FRIEND ¬.¬
 * I agree. I'm thinking of "Average Edits" policy, that users must make at least 40 mainspace edits in the month, or they will be warned. We don't need users who just chat. There is no loss if we lose them.
 * I do not oppose that we may need to think of such a rule if the drama intensifies. Also, please dont say "There is no loss if we lose them". Contributing here is not confined to simply editing articles, and who knows? Mabye after a user entered chat, and feel welcomed here, he might as well change his or her mind and edit :) --Rowboat Pin.PNGtalk 09:35, January 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * By Average Edits, I never meant new users. New users are free to stay upto 2 months max. By 2 months, they might know the basics of the most important thing, Editing.


 * Oh I see. I do agree with you if you that's what you mean. --Rowboat Pin.PNGtalk 09:44, January 24, 2013 (UTC)

Deleting Unneeded Articles (+4)
Suggested by Cp kid and confirmed by Hey.youcp

CK (Cp kid) has suggested that we delete these articles: Please vote and leave a comment with your opinion. Also, any other suggestions for articles that need to be deleted would be fine.
 * Dugglus- Not a major enough role for an article.
 * Orange Penguin- Doesn't need explaining...
 * Community Penguins- Unimportant, but could be merged into Homepage if so desired.
 * The Yellow Puffle and Orange Penguin- Same as Community Penguins.
 * Blue Tour Guide- Same as Community Penguins.
 * Tour Guide (Moderator)- Not a major "moderator" like Billybob. If your against deletion then merge into Moderators.
 * Ninja (Moderator)- Same as Tour Guide.
 * The Four Ninjas- Not a major enough role for an article.
 * The Aqua Penguin- Same as Four Ninjas.
 * Purple Penguin- Same as Four Ninjas.
 * Brown Games Penguin- Same as Four Ninjas.
 * Beach Penguins- Hopefully this doesn't need explaining...

For (7)

 * 1) <font face="comic sans ms">  Cp kid     Wazzup Wikia!    06:17, January 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) --FlagCanada.svg Lord Master 96  07:15, January 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Penguin-Pal   (talk)
 * 4) Starpuffle00 (talk) 15:40, January 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) A precious gem. UGG! Kthxbai (talk) 03:49, January 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, this time. They are very minor elements and unneeded.
 * Yes, this time. They are very minor elements and unneeded.

Against (3)

 * 1) Gary3008 (talk) 15:43, January 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) --~ Lyra Heartstrings 16:04, January 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Me™ A Surprise™ 21:43, January 21, 2013 (UTC) I agree with all of them except the 4 ninjas

Comments

 * The one who suggested it was really Cp kid on chat BTW :P
 * Maybe the Marvel related articles as well. Some of them have more to do with their actual movie character than CP itself. --FlagCanada.svg Lord Master 96  07:15, January 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * Kinda Pointless to name penguins after their color or what they wear. But the mods articles should remain, or at leas, as you suggested, be mergesd with Moderators. Penguin-Pal   (talk)  12:26, January 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * I Disagree. They could kept Some Characters. they couldn't be deleted now. --~ Lyra Heartstrings 16:04, January 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * I agree, except that you should keep Tour Guide and Ninja.
 * Define unneeded articles
 * The ones like Orange Penguin and Blue Tour Guide and other characaters who doesn't even have an official name needs to be get rid of, in my opinion. However, I am not sure about the moderator articles and the stage play character articles. They do have a little notability. --Rowboat Pin.PNGtalk 09:38, January 24, 2013 (UTC)

New users file uploading (0)
Please read the first lines before moving to the vote part!

One of the staff members has identified what prevents new users from uploading files. I've contacted Wikia support, and they said new users are suppose to upload files, but as uploading files also creates a page, a message tells them they don't have a premission.

They have also asked me to have a discussion with the commmunity, to see what you think.

Please vote, and tell what you think.

For

 * 1) Penguin-Pal   (talk)
 * 2) --Arsenal55702 (talk) 12:30, January 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) User:Hunjo11

Against

 * 1) -- WE'RE NOT GONNA TAKE IT. WE'RE NOT GONNA TAKE IT.  WE'RE NOT GONNA TAKE IT...ANYMORE! 23:10, January 10, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) 123kitten1
 * 3) me

Comments

 * This limit prevents additional info by new users to be added to the wiki. Many new users have tried to upload files, but are not able to. Penguin-Pal   (talk)  04:55, December 15, 2012 (UTC)
 * I am staying neutral for now. As you know, allowing new users to upload images to our wiki is a bit too risky. What if they uploaded images with inappropriate content? But, I agree as you mentioned that it would be FAR more convenivent for them, so I am staying neutral. --Rowboat Pin.PNGtalk 14:32, January 10, 2013 (UTC)
 * I would prefer for new users to not be allowed to upload pictures until they have achieved the page-creating requirements. Many new accounts are created for the purpose of vandalism, spam, and adding inappropriate content. No offense, but I do not trust the new users until they make enough good edits that they achieve the page-creating requirements.-- WE'RE NOT GONNA TAKE IT. WE'RE NOT GONNA TAKE IT.  WE'RE NOT GONNA TAKE IT...ANYMORE! 23:10, January 10, 2013 (UTC)
 * I also am staying neutral, as users may be able to upload images or media that contain nudity, swears, or other bad content.
 * I am also neutral! Sometimes users would upload pictures that violate the policies but some could be good pictures and some may be from users that had been here before but just wanted to make a new account the disable their old one so yeah
 * New users could add bad pictures, and we would have many more useless pictures on the wiki. ~123kitten1
 * I read the comments carefully, and I say that they have convinced me to say that new users should have to wait to upload files and add pages, because, as some have already said, people creat accounts for the purpose of vandalism. Me™ A Surprise™ 19:29, January 21, 2013 (UTC)

Rotation Pictures (0)
Suggested by Ocean6100 and confirmed by Dps04

This seems unnecessary to me. I do think the up and down changes should be added, but not rotations. I sometimes think that rotations are unnecessary. What do you think? Thoughts?

Comments
123kitten1