User blog comment:Leekduck/Operation De-N00bification/@comment-1024726-20090825215126

I agree with 1, the WM dynasty is simply a time bomb waiting to go off.

2, I disagree with. Just stop being so stinking suspicious!

3, I agree with. Some of the new users on the Fanon think I'm sort of overlord. The BOB is designed to override that.

4, I disagree with. The usage of the term as an excuse to ban people is bad, but in my opinion, Crises exist. There are many definitions; I define them as when a large number of people will, may, or have quit and/or when the wiki is going through a period of extreme instability.

However, I do agree that recording conflicts is weird. REALLY WEIRD.

5, I also disagree with. Wikia itself calls wikis communities. Wikipedia, I believe, takes itself like a community. By that, I don't mean taking Crises and quitting as the end of the world (sadly I took Crisis II of the Fanon just like that), but taking the website blandly is as bad as taking it too seriously. Do you think the wiki would stay in balance if the editors took their jobs blandly? Article growth would fail. If the rollbacks didn't take their job seriously, vandalism would flourish. You need to take editing seriously. Not too seriously, but still, take it seriously.