Club Penguin Wiki:Promotions

This page is for requesting user rights for a user.

There are 3 types of user rights in this wiki: rollback, administrator and bureaucrat. You can request to recieve these user rights via two people nominating you. One of these people must already be an administrator, the other can be anyone. Once they have nominated you, the administrator must add the request onto the corresponding page. To learn more about the user rights, click here.

Admins Notice: When nominating someone, you should make a Level 2 Section with their name. This shows you what you need to type in. Please fill in the gaps correctly.

== (0)== Nominated by and. ===For (0)=== ===Against (0)=== ===Comments ===

Nominee Notice: After being nominated, you can enter reasons on why you should be nominated next to the "nomination sentence". Your automatically closes after 2 weeks. To be successful, you must have a vote difference of +7. A vote difference is calculated by the amount of "for" votes subracted by the amount of "against" votes. Furthermore, 2 sysops must have voted for if the nomination is successful.

Voters Notice: You must vote in either "For" or "Against". If you vote in for, you have to sign underneath the "For" heading. To do this you have to type this in: *~

You may also leave a comment no longer than a sentence when you sign. Any longer and you have to leave it in the "Comments" section.

After you have signed it, you must change the number in the brackets up by 1. (e.g if it was at 3, it means 3 people have already signed it. Change it to 4 when you sign it.) This is also the same with the number by their name. If you vote for, you must also increase the number beside his name by 1.

Your request must be added in one of these sections:

=Rollback Requests= =Sysop Requests=

Ratonbat (0)
Nominated by Tigernose and Minisure25.

Thanks Tigernose, I only want to say here what I told to tigernose: ''I wanna be sysop only to help this wiki(a). You know, when I see a vandal or someone who deserves to be blocked, it makes me very mad not to block them, I do revert there edits but if he/she was blocked, it could be easier. When I see someone like that, I do tell a sysop, so he/she can't vandalize or spam articles. I would also like to be sysop to delete un-useful pages, and if I see them without sysop powers I do put the delete template, but it is a waste of time for me and the admin who has to delete it. Well, I think that's all, I do guarantee you I won't power abuse.''--Ratonbat 19:45, September 16, 2009 (UTC)

For (+4)

 * Unknown4  Talk  19:49, September 16, 2009 (UTC)
 * "ahem"-- C ed 12 14 Talk Page 22:41, September 16, 2009 (UTC)
 * WOMPUS! DESTROYER OF EVIL!.gif See Me Here! _Hate Mail Here_  MY EVIL ENEMY!!!
 * --Gamgee 20:24, September 17, 2009 (UTC)

Against (-4)

 * Im not sure.. yet. -- seahorseruler | Talk  (EditCount) Yoshi! 21:46, September 16, 2009 (UTC)
 * You haz enough... Requests are suppose to be closed anyway... NOT A STAFF OR HELPER &mdash; Joey   aa  00:05, September 17, 2009 (UTC)
 * Nope...-- ' DON'T MESS WITH THA SHARK BOI! 00:30, September 17, 2009 (UTC)harkbate DON'T MESS WITH THA SHARK BOI! 00:30, September 17, 2009 (UTC)
 * A bit too inexperienced, maybe?--CatZip888 20:04, September 17, 2009 (UTC)

Comments
I do feel that administrator nominations are not needed at the moment, but Ratonbat was the first person to ask me for nomination. I felt that I did not want to nominate anyone, but I asked Ratonbat to give me a reason why he wants this nomination. It was very good, I think we could do with another sysop, although he will have to prove himself by being a lot more active in these 2 weeks. Ratonbat may wish to give reasons by himself above. I am currently not voting yet, as I am waiting to see what he does first. -- Թայգէրնոս   (Chat| Edits) 15:16, September 16, 2009 (UTC)


 * Not yet.. I need to see more activeness and also, please enjoy the quote below:

Still dont believe me? See This. -- seahorseruler | Talk  (EditCount) Yoshi! 23:42, September 16, 2009 (UTC)

Sea, I was just saying I thought I should and deserved it time ago but i couldn't be sysop cause the promotions were closed, I do think your right with the quit thingy, I maybe was a bit power hungry... hehe, i'm not know, I think....--Ratonbat 23:46, September 16, 2009 (UTC)

Raton deserves this! Unknown4  Talk  00:20, September 17, 2009 (UTC)


 * Unknown, you only say that because you think being an old user means you should have power! That's not even true! Tigernose reopened the requests without PERMISSION! This request is garbage, okay? -- ' DON'T MESS WITH THA SHARK BOI! 00:32, September 17, 2009 (UTC)harkbate DON'T MESS WITH THA SHARK BOI! 00:32, September 17, 2009 (UTC)
 * There was nothing wrong with opening requests again, no one was going to get nominated anyway: I only nominated Ratonbat because he had a year to prove himself, has over 2000 edits and a lot more. I didn't even vote for. Sharkbate, if you want to, just message me and we'll close the requests. There is nothing wrong with just informing me and closing this down okay? I only reopened them due to the new system which will reduce the amount of applicants. This was nothing more than a "test", I knew people weren't going to vote for due to our situation. Sharkbate, close it if you wish, I do not mind. -- Թայգէրնոս  [[Image:Tigernosem.png|20px]] (Chat| Edits) 16:30, September 17, 2009 (UTC)

Even though I'd think he'd be good with the powers, I don't think he should be a sysop yet. I'll wait for spotlight and a few more growth months before yes. -- Zapwire  (Talk 12:52, September 17, 2009 (UTC)

When Sea became a sysop there were about 47 more sysops. Then we decided there were too many. now we have 19 and you still say it's too many. Think about what I just said. -- Unknown4  Talk  19:30, September 17, 2009 (UTC)
 * When Sea became a sysop no one cared about the amount of sysops (ahem, TurtleShroom). Then I came back and so did Joeyaa and he actually did something about this. 19 is way too many anyway, but still, we hardly have around 2 sysops at the moment (that are active). -- Թայգէրնոս  [[Image:Tigernosem.png|20px]] (Chat| Edits) 19:48, September 17, 2009 (UTC)


 * Tigernose has a point, the "never too many sysops" thing was overrated anyways.-- C ed 12 14 Talk Page 19:52, September 17, 2009 (UTC)
 * Still, Joeyaa seem disturbed at the fact that requests opened again. Also, he isn't very active, doesn't always use correct grammar, and being old isn't a qualification! -- ' DON'T MESS WITH THA SHARK BOI! 20:27, September 17, 2009 (UTC)harkbate DON'T MESS WITH THA SHARK BOI! 20:27, September 17, 2009 (UTC)
 * Your My Brother Ratonbat, Your Gonna Have Always My Vote!-- Merbat Talk to me! [[Image:Penguinsig.PNG]] 21:46, September 17, 2009 (UTC)
 * Merbat, that's cheating. You're vote should be removed! Being a sibling of someone doesn't count as a qualification! -- ' DON'T MESS WITH THA SHARK BOI! 22:00, September 17, 2009 (UTC)harkbate DON'T MESS WITH THA SHARK BOI! 22:00, September 17, 2009 (UTC)

=Bureaucrat Requests= '''BUREAUCRAT REQUESTS ARE CURRENTLY CLOSED. WE ALREADY HAVE ENOUGH BUREAUCRATS.'''