Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-5365082-20140710014409/@comment-24657722-20140723153804

WhitePuffleTron wrote: The Puffle Planet wrote: WhitePuffleTron wrote: Ecpg wrote: WhitePuffleTron wrote: Grand Moff Birdin wrote: Flallaana wrote: The thing about the Frozen Takeover is Disney is just trying to milk as much success out of Frozen as possible. Its been a massive success and for Disney that equates to business opportunity and merchandising for extra money to jam between their mouse ears. The thing is though this probably wouldnt be necessary on even Club Penguin though which is possibly why its not entirely set in stone if it will happen. From a marketing strategy its a wise choice though. Who knows? Maybe Frozen might be the new Angry Birds except instead of Rovio milking success its Disney. Although most of what they could do is try and get the 1% (or at least it feels that way) of people who didnt watch Frozen such as myself to watch the movie. But Im really not interested. It seems most of what Disney advertises is stuff they recently bought with their massive wealth but this is only the second time its a movie theyve made themselves. Odd huh? Im going off on a tangent here. Its a marketing strategy. You know what else is just a marketing strategy for Disney? Club Penguin. So their thought process is why not put two marketing tools together?

EDIT: This says Im replying to someone but Im not... Welcome to the business world. The world ends if Disney buys the army.....Disney won't fight back, and we would lose a future war The party was made because many people wanted not like how it is but many people wanted that The only takeover that probably nobody would hate is a Toontown takeover (the awesome 10 year old game that was shut down) BOOMBAH! Yeah, man... yeah.
 * and a Phineas and Ferb takeover


 * and a Billybob takeover

First time that i agree with you :P
 * and a kill-ugly stuff takeover