Club Penguin Wiki:Vote Page

The Wiki's Vote Page is made to hold all kinds of votes.

When a vote is held, you will be allowed to sign your username, using four Tildes ~

Each vote will be published in this way:

 (0)

 * Suggested by and confirmed by

Comments
Nominee Notice: After being nominated, you can enter reasons on why you should be nominated next to the "nomination sentence". A vote closes when 14 days is up. The vote difference is calculated by the number of votes "for" subtracted by the number "against". The user option with the most vote differences wins.

Voter Notice: You must vote in either "For" or "Against". If you vote in for, you have to sign underneath the "For" heading. To do this you have to type this in:

#~

After you have signed it, you must change the number in the brackets up by 1. (e.g if it was at 3, it means 3 people have already signed it. Change it to 4 when you sign it.) This is also the same with the number by their name. If you vote for, you must also increase the number beside his or her name by 1.

Please remember to use "#" instead of the usual "*", because it numbers the votes making it easier to count them.

You can also remove your vote. If in any case you change your mind, do not remove your vote completely, just strike it out and move it to the back of the list.

Please discuss with an administrator before creating a new vote!

Please create votes under this line:

Allow Anon. Chat (+5)

 * Suggested by Tiff or Nick and confirmed by Hey.youcp

For (7)

 * 1) Tiff or Nick (talk) 02:06, May 19, 2013 (UTC)
 * 08:44, May 19, 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) David231099  ( Talk ) ( Contribs )   08:19, May 19, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) --TheHelioptile2014 (talk) 20:05, May 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) --Leo2301.PNG MiXeR23*1 (Messages!) 02:35, May 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) --Carlos Mtz2 (Talk)   (Blogs)  02:50, May 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5)  ( user  ·  talk  ·  blog  ·  contribs  ·  editcount  · [ logs ] · [ block log ] · [ rights log ]) 12:29, May 25, 2013 (UTC)

Against (2)

 * 1) If you try to prove Murphy's Law wrong, you're gonna have a bad time. 03:30, May 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) The Thunder Brave, Kyoryu Gold is here!  Vanquishing the evil in the name of heaven! 11:36 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Comments

 * I'm not sure if thats possible... I would definitely be for to allow for Spydar007 to come on chat, but I don't think its possible :( -- David231099 ( Talk ) ( Contribs )   08:19, May 19, 2013 (UTC)
 * I am defiantly for. 08:44, May 19, 2013 (UTC)
 * Sorry to burst your bubbles, but I don't think an "anon" chat is possible. Unless Penguin-Pal uses his magical coding powers to cough one up. Besides I'm not even sure Wikia would allow it anyway. --United_States_flag.png  S  h  u  r  o  w Water_Balloon_snowball.png 08:55, May 19, 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm sure Penguin-Pal can find a way. 08:58, May 19, 2013 (UTC)
 * Staff can enable this, but i'm not sure if it's a good idea to have such a large access to so many people in chat. Thouh i suppose we can give it a try and see how it works. Penguin-Pal   (talk)  16:30, May 19, 2013 (UTC)
 * I am not voting because I support this but I don't see how this is possible! Wikia is kinda being racist to anons by not letting them on chat I have been dumped in the sea! 09:31, May 19, 2013 (UTC)
 * I can make an anonymous chat myself. However, I need an admin to help me with this. Tiff or Nick (talk) 10:16, May 19, 2013 (UTC)
 * @Jack If wikia did allow anons to chat, we would get a lot more spammers/cussers It's John Egbert!  Bow down to me or suffer the consequences! 15:29 19 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Dororo we get cussers and spammers that are not anons on chat so that doesn't really prove things Oh my god! They killed Kenny! 08:25, May 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * Jack the anon would basically be like a 2nd account and for the proxy guys like Sid, the spamming/swearing would go up by 2 thanks to anons chatting. Also, some people *don't know who* would probably go to where the IP is and mess around with it. Also also, what if the anons are blocked people logged out. The Thunder Brave, Kyoryu Gold is here! Vanquishing the evil in the name of heaven! 11:34 26 May 2013 (UTC)
 * "Also also, what if the anons are blocked people logged out" – admins usually IP block users. By the way, if an anon is someone who is blocked but not logged out and isn't IP blocked, they can cause even more harm outside of the chat. ( user  ·  talk  ·  blog  ·  contribs  ·  editcount  · [ logs ] · [ block log ] · [ rights log ]) 17:33, May 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * OK then you can tell me why when we IP blocked Mattgelo's sock and Kitten, they still had the chance to edit while logged out. The Thunder Brave, Kyoryu Gold is here!  Vanquishing the evil in the name of heaven! 17:39 27 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Nice idea! We could get to know more about anonymous users too! --Leo2301.PNG MiXeR23*1 (Messages!) 02:35, May 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * If staff agree, why not? ( user  ·  talk  ·  blog  ·  contribs  ·  editcount  · [ logs ] · [ block log ] · [ rights log ]) 12:29, May 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * In regards with the voting, I must oppose, since the traffic of the chat would increase vastly, to the point where the chat could lag out and the ChatBot could break down (I assume it could happen). And before allowing anons to the chat we would have to increase the security on the chat. A constant fleet of Chat Moderators patrolling 24/7. I sincerely believe this is a very, very bad idea... If you try to prove Murphy's Law wrong, you're gonna have a bad time. 03:30, May 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * I kinda agree with Vicyorus. Allowing anon on chat will increase spam and vandal attack dramatically, so it seems not a good idea for me, and will also increase the workload for those who are responsible for monitoring the chat. However, if technology allows, we could allow certain anons on chat ONLY, like spydar007. If this is the case, then I would agree. --Rowboat Pin.PNGtalk 03:49, May 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * I lean towards Dps's idea. We can ask wikia tem to make check usernames from some custom whitelist page like MediaWiki:Chat-ip-whitelist, so we can modify it at any time with no need to contact a staff. Penguin-Pal   (talk)  12:20, May 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * If we do what P-P just said, don't you think we should enable Anon chat? 81.101.202.233 16:19, May 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * True. If the average number of users in chat is like 6-8, and the highest number is around 30, all the messages with an fully-open chat would look like a blur... Also it will require further customization (like making sure that it's possible to kick and ban anonymous users). Like other extensions, customizations result a longer loading. Penguin-Pal   (talk)  05:11, May 26, 2013 (UTC)