Club Penguin Wiki:Featured Article

The Featured Article is a spot on the mainpage to show our best articles. A new one appears every month, but they are voted on here. The article with the highest vote difference by the end of the month becomes the featured article. The featured article on the main page is updated on the 29 of that particular month, and the introductory text that goes in the main page slot should also go in the archive. Once an article is chosen to be a featured article, it cannot be nominated again. A template on the page entitled Template:FA indicates it has already been Featured. Template:FA Nominee is used for nominated articles.

Criteria
Articles should only be nominated if they are longer than 3000 bytes.

Articles lower than this byte count can also be nominated, but only if they are relevant to the timeline of Club Penguin (if the article is about a party that was opened this month, then it could be nominated), or if they are very well written. In fact, if the article cannot be made much longer (if it is an item article, but is exceptionally detailed or longer than most item articles) but is still a worthy example of good editing, then it can be nominated.

Nomination guidelines
Nominator Notice: When nominating an article, you should make a Level 2 Section with its name. A link should be in the title of the section as well. This shows you what you need to type in. Please fill in the gaps correctly.

 (0)
Nominated by.

Comments
Voters Notice: Please read the voting policy thoroughly before you vote.

You must vote in either "For" or "Against". If you vote in for, you have to sign underneath the "For" heading. To do this you have to type this in:

#~

You may also leave a comment no longer than a sentence when you sign. Any longer and you have to leave it in the "Comments" section.

After you have signed it, you must change the number in the brackets up by 1. (e.g. if it was at 3, it means 3 people have already signed it. Change it to 4 when you sign it). This is also the same with the number by their name. If you vote for, you must also increase the number beside his name by 1.

Please remember to use "#" instead of the usual "*", because it numbers the votes making it easier to count them.

'''You can also remove your vote. If in any case you change your mind, do not remove your vote completely, just strike it out and move it to the back of the list. Remember to use an asterisk when moving it to the back of list, as it would not show up as a numbered point.'''

Nominations

Hollywood Party (0)
Nominated by Wadberg.

Comments

 * I will be honest, I can't decide between this article and the Cadence article since Cadence article contains a lot of information and the Hollywood Party, Spike Hike is spoiling MUCH information which we know a lot about the upcoming party already... User:Historicalcp
 * I'm not sure to vote for or against because parties seem to win FAOTM often, but last month, the Prehistoric Party wasn't featured. Penguincw (talk) 21:42, February 1, 2013 (UTC)

Cadence (+2)
Nominated by User:Penguincw.

For (3)

 * 1) Penguincw (talk) 21:58, January 29, 2013 (UTC)


 * 1) User:Krisjj859


 * 1) ME, I VOTE THIS ONE!!!

Comments

 * Since Cadence is going to make an appearance this month, why not nominate this page? Penguincw (talk) 21:58, January 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * This is an exceptionally well done article that fits in with the timeline perfectly. User:AnonymousDuckLoverUser Talk:AnonymousDuckLover 00:24, February 2, 2013 (UTC)

Jet Pack Guy (0)
Nominated by  Batreeqah .

Against (1)

 * 1) Gary the Gadget Guy, Special Affects Designer 00:09, February 2, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

 * 1) I think this article deserves to be featured, because it is very well written on this Wiki.  Batreeqah
 * 2) It's a great page, but Jet Pack Guy has yet to visit as a mascot, and so this page could be much better when he makes does make a visit (or if). Penguincw (talk) 21:42, February 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) I'm nominating because of the quality, not when he visits.  It matters on the quality.  Batreeqah
 * 4) This article needs some major cleanup just like the Gary articles had, I say we wait until then.

Gary3008 (talk) 00:11, February 2, 2013 (UTC)

Aunt Arctic (+1)
Nominated by Gary the Gadget Guy, Special Affects Designer

Comments

 * Can't believe this hasn't been FAOTM yet, its really well written and deserves it.
 * 1) Gary the Gadget Guy, Special Affects Designer 00:09, February 2, 2013 (UTC)