User:ShadowyLeftHand

At age== Full Ban Summary == Okay.

First off, this user straight out called the Laws stupid, and its writer an idiot. Guess who wrote it?

Her smart mou- um, I mean, "Constructive Criticism" successfully condemned all the wiki stands for, and everything the Law tries to uphold.

Condemning every Law, one by one, she successfully became one the worst users ever.

She took it so far, that she said her rant and hatred toward the Wiki was "helping" it, and that anyone who bans her is a "Bad Admin", for not tolerating her incessive smart-mouth.

Shall I continue?

She called herself "politically moderate", but later deemed us communistic on a talk page.

She said she was a Christian, but stated that her user name on "Quiz Bowl" was "Devil's Left Hand". Absolute contradiction.


 * Let's Quote!


 * "If you want to know, my username is a parody of Satanism. Left Hand of the Devil was my old Quiz Bowl nickname."

Oh, but it gets better, fellow Wiki readers!


 * "Mockery is a part of life. Restricting such is a failure."

Mockery is a part of life. Finding amusement in other's misery is a failure.


 * "Now, feel free to do what you want with this page, but listen to what I have to say. Your rules FAIL."

The last time I heard that term used, I think Captain Str00del said it.

Who says "epic failure", or "Your rules FAIL" anymore? For the sake of grammar: "Your rules HAVE failed!"


 * "[Flystar5555] threatened the BANHAMMER for one of my friends over at Halopedia when he was MERELY JOKING."

Knock knock. Who's there? I don't care. I don't care who? I don't care who was joking, if it got a ban, it shouldn't have been said.


 * "I AM being civil. I am civilly disobeying your rules to make a point that the rules are stupid. Ever heard of Martin Luther King Jr.? What about Gandhi? They encouraged civil disobedience to make equality happen. Your rules are discriminative, I’m just pointing it out."

Martin Luther King Junior rules, and I know it. I had the honor of reading his speeches and seeing video clips, and it was amazing. Gandhi helped India become independent from British colonization, I do believe. Their civil disobediance made our world a better place. Your civil disobediance is just a pathetic attempt to create a Crisis III.


 * "Also, little kids won’t be going on the internet BY THEMSELVES. They’ll be going on with parents around. That’s why the site should be rated PG instead of G."

Okay. Explain why Sk8erbluscat is ELEVEN, or why we have ten year olds on this wiki? How come I am fifteen, yet cling to censorship? You have no authority to say what children do. I went on a computer at age four (a Windows 95) and scattered my mother's specialist degree finals all across her hard drive. At age Thirteen, I came on this wiki, and was eventually appointed to the status I have today.

Furthermore, parents don't have to be "Big Brother" if they trust their children to stay off bad sites, and inform them about any problems or controversy that arrives. Believe it or not, some children have an mutual relationship with their parents. They tell them their problems, and gain advice from them. Most people call that being a "Momma's boy". I call it Honesty.


 * Look! Here's another one!


 * I know this is breaking almost every single rule in your Laws, and I really don’t give a.

Then why did you come here?


 * Here's my FAVORITE ONE!


 * "You have the worst set of laws ever, and I will pick apart each one as I watch you writhe in disgust."

She came here with the intention of making everyone miserable; to intentionally cause Crisis III. She just defied her "Civil Disobediance" quote by doing so. Martin Luther King Junior boycotted and protested by peaceful means. So too did Gandhi. Yet, I kind of think that wanting us to "writhe in disgust" is a means of creating violent uprising to cause choas in the Wiki.

That about sums it up, TurtleShroom