Forum:Shoutbox delete right

OK all, I guess it's about time I explain what has been going on a little more thoroughly. Recently, Wikia decided on its own accord to begin testing a possible new global right for all sysops. (You can think of ourselves as beta testers, if you will) The question here is whether or not we can handle the right in itself without abusing it to a point whereas drama is created. Our goal thus is to prove we can ourselves handle the right without using it over-zealously. What is the right?
 * 1) It allows users with it to simply delete shoutbox messages by clicking a prefixing "X" button (this prevents spam/vandalism or anything you wouldn't want your users to see be hidden from the Shoutbox permanently, and leave you to not have to spam 50 messages yourself to have it removed)


 * All in all this is pretty simple, right? Well, we have a problem, the possibility for abuse is extremely high and users could easily use it to manipulate conversations or remove items based on personal bias. to overcome this concern, we must be extremely careful with who we give this right to (at this time). For this specific test, we'll be looking for two users to be given this right based upon a simple vote.


 * Users given this right should probably be the two admins that visit the shoutbox a lot, have prove time and again they can handle extra responsibility, and for the accuracy of this test, I'll suggest be non-bureaucrats/"webmasters" (for the sole purpose of showing regular sysops can be trusted). With all of these reasons combined, I have myself come up with the nominations of User:Seahorseruler and User:Tigernose. Both are active on the shoutbox, have sparkle clean records, and in my own opinion are trustful enough to test something in its beta stages. I'll like to poke at my *just a sysops* note to remind that we're trying to give this to all sysops, so giving it to bureaucrats doesn't specifically make the test more accurate.

Now for the voting, what I've set up is a Support or Oppose section per nominee, you can vote for any nominee (once per person) and the two nominees with the more support than oppose votes will be given the right for its beta testing right. You are allowed to nominate another user (sysop) but not yourself, and you must post an accountable reason and then simply follow the style I've set up. I'll accept questions either here or on my talk page, and of course, have a magnificent day! NOT A STAFF OR HELPER &mdash; Joey   aa  07:32, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Support

 * I am so surprised nobody has voted for Sea! They all voted for Tigernose! Tigernose would do a good job and I trust him, but he isn't as active! We need active users for this. 2 people who go on the Shout Box constantly. Seahorseruler is someone who goes on constantly. I won't make you change your votes, but like COME ON! Sea is a very trustworthy user and he has never used his powers for abuse! -- ' DON'T MESS WITH THA SHARK BOI! 14:15, 18 August 2009 (UTC)harkbate DON'T MESS WITH THA SHARK BOI! 14:15, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Support

 * yesh-LEEKDUCK


 * YUP-- C ed 12 14 Talk 12:29, 18 August 2009 (UTC)


 * No offense to Seahorse, gbut I think Tigernose be'd better for the job. -- Zapwire  (Talk 12:31, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Oppose

 * I'd rather someone else. --SNAILS FOREVA! 13:20, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry, Tigernose, but you don't visit the shout box 24/7.. -- seahorseruler | Talk  (EditCount) Yoshi! 13:35, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Support

 * Yes! 100%. And, after all, he is a webmaster! 'Iamred  Is Cool!   Speak to the Chief of Red Team!  CLICK HERE! 13:27, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Sharkbate is one of the most active users and Shout Box talkers! He has the most edits and is a very trust worthy and kind user! Seahorseruler isn't as active as Shark is on the Shout Box. Tigernose logs on like 3 times a week. No offence to them. I just think Sharkbate is the guy for the job! --SNAILS FOREVA! 13:29, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Yep, and what do you mean, G, I'm on the shout box all day, if you watch closely. And I think shark would be great also. Shark is the top contributer, he does not power abuse, he knows right from wrong, he has experience, and he handles things maturely. -- seahorseruler | Talk  (EditCount) Yoshi! 13:47, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 * SURE! I'm backing up my buddy Shark! -- Spongebobrocks09 I told you I wanted to talk! 14:11, 18 August 2009 (UTC)