Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-4811793-20130620230822/@comment-7817621-20130625203609

186.55.50.15 wrote: 174.49.208.85 wrote: ALRIGHT, THAT'S IT. Spyder, I don't know you, but from what I've read you have been very very helpful. Anons like you shouldn't be excluded from posting. All you people who are celebrating the exclusion of Anons, that isn't very nice. All those 'Anons vandalize the most', 'Anons are annoying', and 'Try to find something where Anons were helpful' things are lies, in my opinion. The CPW needs Anons. I'm with you man, not all the anons are bad, listen to Michael Jackson (it starts Bad) because we aren't bad, anons aren't bad, you know it, we aren't bad, lala, you know it, we aren't bad, only someones, lala, you know it, we aren't bad, (a part I don't remember) who's bad? When i hear these word's, i agree. The person who did this: (A) Lost their brain cell. (B) Hates anons. (C) They did this cause he's tired of the name Anoymous. Luckly none of the anwsers are me. :)