Club Penguin Wiki:Rollback Promotions

This is a vote page for selecting new Rollbacks.


 * Please Note!
 * You can only vote in the For section for one nominee; all others can be only be voted against.
 * To submit a new nominee, please contact one of the admins.
 * If you're nominated, you are not allowed to vote for yourself.
 * A vote closes one week after the user being nominated.

New submissions go under this line

Miss Sanrio (0)

 * Confirmed by Callum Fawsitt (Vote Ends July 29)

For (1)

 * 1) Hypotheticalhypercaneeg0.jpgcaneTeen(talk)Hypotheticalhypercaneeg0.jpg 01:08, July 29, 2015 (UTC)

Against (1)

 * 1) Jeserator   H T  T R  !   Football Pin.PNG 15:29, July 29, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

 * I sometimes undo vandalism, and I think I'm capable for it. Whenever I see vandalism, I will try to instantly undo it like I did during the past months when I was on this wiki. Maybe I'll be helpful this time, who knows? Miss Sanrio!  15:36, July 22, 2015 (UTC)
 * I'd like Ember to become a rollback so she can finally have her dream come true. And plus I know what it feels like for a dream to come true, I hope she gets that too. Hypotheticalhypercaneeg0.jpgcaneTeen(talk)Hypotheticalhypercaneeg0.jpg 01:08, July 29, 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't think we should be promoting users just so that a "dream" can come true. Combining these types of edits with rollback rights isn't a good idea, and the fact that edit reverts using the rollback tool are concealed from WikiActivity doesn't make it any better. -- 02:12, July 29, 2015 (UTC)
 * The reason why I don't undo vandalism these days is because this wiki added the abuse filter and now vandalism rarely happens with the abuse filter catching all of the vandalism before it is made into a contribution. Miss Sanrio!  02:45, July 29, 2015 (UTC)
 * Look at the how many edits you have Ember, like 1000. Do you really think that's enough for rollback?. No! 14:01, July 29, 2015 (UTC)
 * Yeah I guess you're right sorry Ember. Hypotheticalhypercaneeg0.jpgcaneTeen(talk)Hypotheticalhypercaneeg0.jpg 02:15, July 29, 2015 (UTC)
 * inb4 this against vote gets removed, idc. Um, someone pls pls pls explain this to me: If one person (two, if you consider the admin who approves the vote) agrees that a user should be promoted, how exactly does that even represent the rest of the community's views??? So basically you're telling me that as long as one admin approves of a promotion and one other user votes for that person, the nominated user is guaranteed a promotion? Hmm, seems legit. Btw, at the top of this page it says "*You can only vote in the For section for one nominee; all others can be only be voted against." js.... I'm sorry, but this "no vote against" thing is absolutely absurd. -- Jeserator   H T  T R  !   Football Pin.PNG 15:29, July 29, 2015 (UTC)