Board Thread:Club Penguin Facts/@comment-26850776-20140717230650/@comment-25396835-20140724003616

Everybody wrote: members vs non-members Dont know how this turned into a members vs non-members thing but I dont think a lot of CP players understand why there are no things that are just for members (then again the target demographic is around like 5 to 12 years old it makes sense people wouldnt understand)

Let me put it this way: If people pay they should be able to get more features. If you didnt have to pay to get extra stuff no one would pay and Disney would make probably like 5% less money (no big deal but they want all they can get) so the have to have bonus features.

Let me put this in a real world perspective but in an inversed way. Say you had a job at a company. Everyone gets paid different amounts of money depending on their role within the company and how well they work. But say it was similar to what people want with non-members being equal to members. It would be something like this: I dont have a big role in the company (say Im like a janitor) and I also slack off a lot. But you worked hard and were one of the biggest people in the company. If the M = N-M thing were applied to this situation we would be paid the same amount. Thats illogical.

I do less and you do more but we get paid the same. What lots of people want is members pay and non-members dont pay but get the same features. Doesnt make sense does it?

In my made up scenario... why would you work harder if you get the same pay? In the M = N-M scenario... why would you pay if you still get the same features? What Im saying is: if you want more features then pay. If you dont pay you dont get more features. Simple as that.

Now before this gets closed for being "off-topic" Im saying this all because of the first few comments which Im completely agree with and Im also addressing a painfully common "non-members should get as much as members" rant.