Club Penguin Wiki:Vote Page

The Wiki's Vote Page is made to hold all kinds of votes.

When a vote is held, you will be allowed to sign your username, using four tildes ~

Each vote will be published in this way:

 (0)

 * Suggested by and confirmed by

Comments
Nominee Notice: After being nominated, you can enter reasons on why you should be nominated next to the "nomination sentence". A vote closes when 14 days is up. The vote difference is calculated by the number of votes "for" subtracted by the number "against". The user option with the most vote differences wins.

Voter Notice: You must vote in either "For" or "Against". If you vote in for, you have to sign underneath the "For" heading. To do this you have to type this in:

#~

After you have signed it, you must change the number in the brackets up by 1. (e.g if it was at 3, it means 3 people have already signed it. Change it to 4 when you sign it.) This is also the same with the number by their name. If you vote for, you must also increase the number beside his or her name by 1.

Please remember to use "#" instead of the usual "*", because it numbers the votes making it easier to count them.

You can also remove your vote. If in any case you change your mind, do not remove your vote completely, just strike it out and move it to the back of the list.

Please discuss with an administrator before creating a new vote!

Please create votes under this line:

==Changing the vote system for RFA, POTM, IOTM, FA and FI (+9)==
 * Suggested by Super Miron and confirmed by Penguin-Pal

Currently, you can vote for one person/item/article/image to increase their/its vote difference and then vote against everyone/everything else to decrease their vote difference – this is unfair because the nominee with the largest vote difference wins, and not all nominees with a positive vote difference.

When this vote passes, you can only vote for one nominee, and whichever gets the most votes wins.

For (10)

 * 13:49, August 20, 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) -- Roger6881  (talk)   13:57, August 20, 2014 (UTC)
 * 2) --Rowboat Pin.PNGtalk 14:05, August 20, 2014 (UTC)
 * 3) Penguin-Pal   (talk)  14:09, August 20, 2014 (UTC)
 * 4) EEK.png you know it is Apj
 * 5) Kallie Jo   (talk)  15:29, August 20, 2014 (UTC)
 * 21:09, August 20, 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Callum Fawsitt
 * 2) --FlagBahrain.svg Wolf-gangs ( T a l k ) 09:46, August 24, 2014 (UTC)
 * 3) Zomg_its_homer_simpson_from_CP.png Bangarang. Zomg_its_homer_simpson_from_CP.png 10:05, September 1, 2014 (UTC)

Comments

 * Would it be better to incoporate a comment in 'against' votes; and if it's not a valid reason like "This user banned more/I don't like the article," then we remove it? -- Roger6881  (talk)   13:57, August 20, 2014 (UTC)
 * Totally Support this idea. This would make the calculation for the % of overall votes each candidate gets in the POTM Report much easier as we no longer have to count the against votes. This proposal also makes voting on the wiki much more similar to real-life votes (like in a presidential election, you would only vote for a candidate, but you won't vote against someone else, right? :P) --Rowboat Pin.PNGtalk 14:05, August 20, 2014 (UTC)
 * (almost forgot to mention this, this is actually quite important :p) However, if there is only one eligible candidate in the votes, then I think the current voting system should still apply. The candidate would have to get more for votes than against votes for his nomination to pass. Of course, if my "grant trial option" voting proposal gets passed as well, then if the candidate get the most votes for grant trial, he will be granted a trial instead. --Rowboat Pin.PNGtalk 14:10, August 20, 2014 (UTC)
 * Good point, though, we would have to start every single vote with an against section (unless multiple are nominated on the same time), and folks that voted against will have to stay tuned. Penguin-Pal   (talk)  15:29, August 20, 2014 (UTC)
 * You're right, so I think we should divide promotion forums into 2 types: promotion votes and promotion approval. In promotion votes, more than 1 user can participate in the votes, and just as roger suggests, the candidate with the most number of votes win, where against votes will be abolished. In promotion approval, only one user can be nominated for a post, and if the user receives more for votes than against votes, then he should be promoted, or if he receives the most number of grant trial votes (if my proposal gets passed), he will be given a trial. We should specify which type we are conducting before allowing nominations. --Rowboat Pin.PNGtalk 15:44, August 20, 2014 (UTC)
 * Makes sense. We can add it to the "Voter Notice." -- 21:09, August 20, 2014 (UTC)
 * This is a really good idea and I strongly agree with everyone's point. Callum Fawsitt
 * Great idea!! Thanks for suggesting this Miron XP. --FlagBahrain.svg Wolf-gangs ( T a l k ) 09:46, August 24, 2014 (UTC)
 * I thought it was like that anyway :P 10:10, September 1, 2014 (UTC)

Talk Page Redesign or Chat Entering the Text thingy Redesign? (+3)

 * Suggested by GlitchPokemon and confirmed by Awesome335.

Hello There, Penguin-Pal Had made that dialogue for me: http://clubpenguin.wikia.com/wiki/Template:GlitchPokemon it's possibly suggesting that it will be used for Talk pages or at least Chat entering the text thingy... Please don't vote against.

For (3)

 * 1) --~ DIGIMON IS AWESOME  (Talk) 20:56, September 2, 2014 (UTC)
 * 2) Callum
 * 3) Darien8910 (talk)