User blog comment:Seth4564TI/Am I Leaving The Wiki?/@comment-28217775-20171223142235

Technically I could remove this blog as it's clear it exists to evoke drama (not naming names isn't a Get Out of Jail Free card), but I won't because I'm not going to desperately try to save my own hide like that.

To respect your "no naming names" clause (although I'm happy to name the names if you're happy), I'll be referring to one as User 1, and the other as User 2.

"one of them got one (and almost two) administrators demoted and leave the wiki" - so User 1 used the Demotion Project. There's no problem there, you can do the same - anyone can do the same. User 1 did not make the administrator leave - they decided to. Irrelevant.

"while the other tries to cause drama in the chat on purpose" (User 2) - interestingly all your evidence from the logs showcases User 1 (and an aside from Yoshi, who's not even part of this so I'm not sure why he's in there) attempting to start drama. None of these show User 2 doing what you said they are guilty of. Relevant to User 1 - sanction due when they come on chat.

"One of the users kept PMing me disrespectful words (swears included) at least once or twice a week, until I finally told an admin about it. The admin then proceeds to PM the user disrespecting me, and apparently that user denies the claim. It then gets to the point to where the admin has to block whoever is lying. And guess what? The user still denied the claim. In the end, there was not enough proof for either, and nobody was blocked- that is when I was fed up with that user, and started caring less and less about the chat." This whole matter could have (and should have) been solved by you blocking the PM. The whole debacle of blocking you or User 1 was a mistake. I know policy isn't always followed to the T, but blocking somebody for doing something the "Block Private Messages" button exists for (or blocking for lying about getting a PM) is ridiculous. Irrelevant - administrator's mistake.

"Another problem is that a while ago I created an emoticon, right? Eventually, they started using that emoticon disrespectfully and it got annoying to some people real fast- Eventually I'd request for it to be removed, and two or three admins got it removed. But wait, how did three admins remove it? Well, the answer to that is- One of the admins kept bringing it back. So, I replaced the file that the emoticon was to something else, because it is my emoticon. Then, the admin would revert it back- and then threaten to block me for changing it ([2017-10-10 07:04:05] <> !tell Seth4564TI I won't warn you again about changing an emote through the upload log). Eventually, it turned into a COMPLETELY UNNECESSARY admin edit war, and the emoticon was forced to stay." Let me correct you here. You requested to have (Raven) removed, which is completely fair and you have the right to do - and it was. User 2 then decided to add a different emote - (edge) with their own uploaded picture. The image happened to be the same that was used for (Raven) - that is irrelevant. The uploaded image itself was uploaded by User 2, and it was a new emote with a different trigger altogether. You have no right to change somebody else's emote, it is vandalism. Yes, the edit war was completely unnecessary - the unnamed other administrator was mistaken to remove it (I don't blame them, it's confusing). This entire point is about you complaining about being told off for vandalising another user's emote. Since it seems you don't get it, I'll tell you once more - please don't vandalise others' images. Relevant to Seth4564TI - now been warned.

It was a good read!