Club Penguin Wiki:Vote Page

The Wiki's Vote Page is made to hold all kinds of votes.

When a vote is held, you will be allowed to sign your username, using four Tildes  ~

Each vote will be published in this way:

== (0)==

Suggested by and confirmed by 

===For (0)===

===Against (0)===

===Comments ===

Nominee Notice: After being nominated, you can enter reasons on why you should be nominated next to the "nomination sentence". A vote closes when 14 days is up. The vote difference is calculated by the number of votes "for" subtracted by the number "against". The user option with the most vote differences wins.

Voter Notice: You must vote in either "For" or "Against". If you vote in for, you have to sign underneath the "For" heading. To do this you have to type this in:

#~

After you have signed it, you must change the number in the brackets up by 1. (e.g if it was at 3, it means 3 people have already signed it. Change it to 4 when you sign it.) This is also the same with the number by their name. If you vote for, you must also increase the number beside his or her name by 1.

Please remember to use "#" instead of the usual "*", because it numbers the votes making it easier to count them.

You can also remove your vote. If in any case you change your mind, do not remove your vote completely, just strike it out and move it to the back of the list.

Please discuss with an administrator before creating a new vote!

 Please create votes under this line: 

Demote Happy65 (+6)
I know everyone liked him and was helpful. But, let's take it more seriously now, he is not active since September 20, 2012. Before that he took like 2 holidays expanding from 1-2 weeks. I assume he is not longer needed to be a bureaucrat nor admin too. So guys, please think wisely and then vote.

For (11)

 * 1) --FlagBahrain.svg Sdgsgfs ( T a l k )
 * 2) --The super spy's  Homepage and Mail Box :P 13:35, October 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) ~Ycdm~
 * 4) LEGO
 * 5) Penguin-Pal   (talk)  14:55, October 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) Bsyew Talk </li><li><span style="color:" title="My contributions to the wiki!">Contributions </li><li> Edit Stats </li><li><span style="color:" title="News!.">News </li></li></ul></li></ul> 15:40, October 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) -- Roger6881 <font face="papyrus" color="blue">Waddle On! 18:44, October 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) -- Roger6881 <font face="papyrus" color="blue">Waddle On! 18:44, October 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) -- Roger6881 <font face="papyrus" color="blue">Waddle On! 18:44, October 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) -- Roger6881 <font face="papyrus" color="blue">Waddle On! 18:44, October 5, 2012 (UTC)

Against (5)

 * 1) Custard the evil bird clone (talk) 15:44, October 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) OZZ2™
 * 3) -- WE'RE NOT GONNA TAKE IT. WE'RE NOT GONNA TAKE IT.  WE'RE NOT GONNA TAKE IT...ANYMORE! 21:39, October 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) OZZ2™
 * 2) -- WE'RE NOT GONNA TAKE IT. WE'RE NOT GONNA TAKE IT.  WE'RE NOT GONNA TAKE IT...ANYMORE! 21:39, October 5, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

 * He is too inactive.
 * Agreed.
 * Let's wait for some more time and decide this. We don't need any impatient demotions.
 * I thought bureaucrats should be here everyday. We were discussing on demoting him on the chat last night. The last time he came on was on September 20. --LEGOSpinjitzu (talk) 14:17, October 5, 2012 (UTC)LEGOSpinjitzu
 * This was your duty, and you didn't fulfilled your task, so there is no reason to keep this user right. Penguin-Pal   (talk)  14:55, October 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * He might just be having a break Custard the evil bird clone (talk) 15:45, October 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * He was a really great admin but has not been editing for too long :-(
 * He was a very good admin in the day; he has not edited or been on wikia chat for awhile so I have to for 'for', I'm sorry, Happy!
 * Absolutely not, for many reasons. One, a bureaucrat is demoted after 1 month of inactivity. It's been 15 days, not a month. Two, Sdgsgfs needs to stop making decisions without asking anyone or checking the protocol for demotions. Three, we give people exceptions when they are overloaded with homework, or does this wiki not follow the policy?. Is this what we want our wiki to become? I, for one, know my answer. NO.-- WE'RE NOT GONNA TAKE IT. WE'RE NOT GONNA TAKE IT.  WE'RE NOT GONNA TAKE IT...ANYMORE! 21:39, October 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, when the moment of true has arrived, it seems our demotion system doesn't work. Sometimes a user right is a right and sometimes it's just a marked input box. Penguin-Pal   (talk)  22:08, October 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * First, I was like inactive for two weeks and the demotion process against me started, and it wasn't taken under the administration decisions. Secondly, Reeze and Awesome335, I didn't decide alone, but with the active administration that are usually available (Reeze, I saw you many time on chat and sent message, but no replys. Awesome335, we can't meet up at the same time sadly). According to the policy (that I no more support) for a Bureaucrat, one month should pass, so he wasn't active since September 20, 2012 meaning he's inactive without giving any reasons. Also, we sent a message to him but got no replies. At least, giving a reason for this would be better before disappearing. Finally, the administration is not only you two, but the others two and you two have no final say over us. --FlagBahrain.svg Sdgsgfs <font face="courier new" color="blue"><font color="#00507B">( <font color="#00649A">T <font color="#0078B9">a <font color="#008DDA">l <font color="#009FF5">k <font color="#3cc2f6">) 13:51, October 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi, please don't remove the vote again. Penguin-Pal   (talk)  13:45, October 9, 2012 (UTC)