Club Penguin Wiki:Vote Page

The Wiki's Vote Page is made to hold all kinds of votes.

When a vote is held, you will be allowed to sign your username, using four Tildes  ~

Each vote will be published in this way:

 (0)

 * Suggested by and confirmed by

Comments
Nominee Notice: After being nominated, you can enter reasons on why you should be nominated next to the "nomination sentence". A vote closes when 14 days is up. The vote difference is calculated by the number of votes "for" subtracted by the number "against". The user option with the most vote differences wins.

Voter Notice: You must vote in either "For" or "Against". If you vote in for, you have to sign underneath the "For" heading. To do this you have to type this in:

#~

After you have signed it, you must change the number in the brackets up by 1. (e.g if it was at 3, it means 3 people have already signed it. Change it to 4 when you sign it.) This is also the same with the number by their name. If you vote for, you must also increase the number beside his or her name by 1.

Please remember to use "#" instead of the usual "*", because it numbers the votes making it easier to count them.

You can also remove your vote. If in any case you change your mind, do not remove your vote completely, just strike it out and move it to the back of the list.

Please discuss with an administrator before creating a new vote!

 Please create votes under this line: 

Featured Party Articles (+9)

 * Nominated by Penguin-Pal

Whenever a new party article is created, it's quickly added to the Featured Article vote, even if the party hasn't started, and there is still no actual information and gallery, or the party started but many of its featured are not available yet.

Also, by looking on comments in the Featured Article vote, several users vote only because they like the party, or excited for the upcoming party, regardless of the article's quality, so we don't have any information about them, or jsut some of the info.

Therefore, I suggest that a party article cannot be nominated to be Featured Article until the party ends.

For (9)

 * 1) Penguin-Pal   (talk)  08:33, April 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) David231099  ( Talk ) ( Contribs )
 * 3) Vicyorus (talk) "If you try to prove Murphy's Law wrong, you're gonna have a bad time" -Me. 22:05, April 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) --Leo2301.PNG MiXeR23*1 (Messages!) 07:50, April 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) -- Roger6881 Waddle On! 19:21, April 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) --Llove Kuwait ( Random Talk page! ) ( Random Blogs page! ) 19:24, April 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * 7) Preston108 12:18, April 11, 2013 (UTC) (Pj with a name change)
 * 8) User:Historicalcp
 * 9) User:Mrpenguin887 Good Idea Penguin Pal!

Comments

 * All the reasons for why i vote for are mentioned above. Penguin-Pal   (talk)  08:33, April 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * I agree, sometimes there are even articles nominated, that I would consider to be stubs. -- David231099 ( Talk ) ( Contribs )   08:52, April 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * I must agree with the users above. It's somewhat stupid to nominate an article if it hasn't even happened or even ended. --Vicyorus (talk) "If you try to prove Murphy's Law wrong, you're gonna have a bad time" -Me. 22:05, April 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * User:Historicalcp, True, True Story...

Character personality section (+8)

 * Suggested by Roger6881 and confirmed by Apj26

Okay so I thought that we could explain more in-depth about what a character's personality is and how that affects them. For instance: ''Herbert is generally a vain grumpy Polar Bear who hates noise. This is hinted when he tries to wreck the island so he can enjoy himself.'' If you see what I mean, this can help a lot.

For (8)

 * 1) -- Roger6881 Waddle On! 19:28, April 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) -- Gold2232  (Talk)  19:42, April 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Penguin-Pal   (talk)  11:05, April 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) David231099  ( Talk ) ( Contribs )
 * 5) ɐɾuıN uǝǝɹפ (talk) 20:10, April 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) Fotty the Hero!
 * 7) User:Historicalcp
 * 8) HULK SMASH!

Comments

 * I posted my reasons above. -- Roger6881 Waddle On! 19:28, April 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * It sounds interesting. Infoboxes and Notices cannot provide this type of information, and if it's included in the intro of the article it would be too long. It really is a great idea. Penguin-Pal   (talk)  11:05, April 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * User:Historicalcp, I really love this idea.

Allow articles to be nominated even though it doesn't fit the month (+2)

 * Suggested by User:Historicalcp, Pending Approval

So, I have seen many people on the FA thingie. And I have seen many good articles with many good information. But still, many people only say "It doesn't fit the month". And for me it is really annoying because then many times they vote for other pages which don't have enough information but its still "fitting the month". I mean, ANY article can be nominated. Like the Christmas Party 2008 in July. Or the Halloween Party 2011 in December. ANY ARTICLE! ANY! And letting it know on the page? People still skip the read because of the laziness sadly...So we must allow the pages I am referring to no matter what. If it contains a lot of info. Its like I am nominating the Valentines Day Celebration 2006 which it could had contained much information but people still skip it because "It doesn't fit the month" and most of the times nominate/vote the upcoming party they are looking for! Its like Penguin-Pal's suggestion. It is REALLY annoying. I have to say it about over and over again almost all the time! -_-

For (3)

 * 1) User:Historicalcp
 * 2) User:Mrpenguin887 Good Idea CP.
 * 3) Ph1n3a5and77 (talk) 20:18, April 16, 2013 (UTC)

Against (1)

 * 1) --Vicyorus (talk) "If you try to prove Murphy's Law wrong, you're gonna have a bad time" -Me. 22:25, April 13, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

 * User:Historicalcp I said why...So I rest my case
 * It's called "Article of THE MONTH" for some reason... --Vicyorus (talk) "If you try to prove Murphy's Law wrong, you're gonna have a bad time" -Me. 22:25, April 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * User:Historicalcp. I know Vic. But still, ANY article can be nominated and it must NOT fit in the month. Like in March 2011 there was "no party", I would had nominated the Puffle Party 2011 but people would say "It doesn't fit the month" and since there is not any other party page article coming on that month (Even tho April Fools is early), they nominate other stuff with NO info.
 * Yes Historical. One time I voted Rainbow Puffle and everyone said "It barely has any info" and then bam the FAOTM is Rainbow Puffle. Ph1n3a5and77 (talk) 20:18, April 16, 2013 (UTC)

Banning roleplaying from the chat (+9)

 * Suggested by Vicyorus.

It has come to my attention that roleplaying on the Chat is becoming a MAJOR problem... Users are getting out of control, roleplays are being created in matter of minutes, the logs are pestered with this nonsensical and unrelated stuff! And the moderators can't do much about it! My proposal is to ban FOREVER any kind of role play on the chat, and punish those who role play with a ban. I know many users will vote against, and they will dislike me, but I'm doing the right thing for the Chat. The Chat was opened to talk with other users, and ask questions, not to be filled with idiotic role plays of matters unrelated to the canon of Club Penguin and the Wikia itself.

Thank you for your attention: -Vicyorus

For (10)

 * 1) Vicyorus (talk) "If you try to prove Murphy's Law wrong, you're gonna have a bad time" -Me. 03:47, April 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Penguin-Pal   (talk)  08:16, April 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) David231099  ( Talk ) ( Contribs )
 * 4) 7w1nk1e102 20:14, April 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * 20:16 16 Apr 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) it's me man! now punch me! 21:05, April 16, 2013
 * 2) --~ Fennekin 21:21, April 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Jj131 the epic guy (talk) 21:23, April 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) It&#39;s Mikey! (talk) 21:39, April 16, 2013 (UTC) HECK YES! :D
 * 5) Marcus949 21:43, April 16, 2013 (UTC)

Against (0)
User:Dever87

Comments

 * My reasons have been stated up on the description. --Vicyorus (talk) "If you try to prove Murphy's Law wrong, you're gonna have a bad time" -Me. 03:47, April 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * Chat isn't a place for roleplaying. If someone does want to, then he shall go to a different wiki caht for this purpose, or PM. If someone is asked to stop roleplaying in ordinary chat and he keeps roleplaying he'll be kicked. Further roleplays result a ban. This is how works (or is suppose to work), anyway. Penguin-Pal   (talk)  08:16, April 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * I so agree, cause roleplay can get SOOO annoying and it clogs up a lot of space and it causes arguements. -- David231099 ( Talk ) ( Contribs )   20:09, April 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * Roleplaying is cool but I do agree. Users are out of control with roleplaying. 7w1nk1e102 20:34, April 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * I roleplayed once but I agree. It sucks Ph1n3a5and77 (talk) 21:05, April 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * I pretty much agree too, because it can get out of hand very quickly. With my RP's, it can get out of control. The chat will overload if a RP is done, leading to arguments, drama, everything. So yeah, i agree. Marcus949 21:43, April 16, 2013 (UTC)