This page is to be used for the mass promotions of January 2015. There are four votes: administrator, bureaucrat, patroller, and chat moderator. There will be one winner for each vote. The votes began on January 3, and they will end on January 17. Admin and bureaucrat nominations will need to be confirmed by a current administrator. Prospective chat moderators and patrollers will nominate themselves for promotion. Each user will only be able to vote for one nominee in the admin and bureaucrat votes. In the mod and patroller votes, users will be allowed to vote for as many nominees as they want.
| Request for rights - Detailed Process of Nomination and Voting |
|---|
|
This page is for requesting user rights. There are six types of user rights in this wiki: interface editors, chat moderators, rollbacks, patrollers, administrators and bureaucrats. You can request to receive some of these rights via two people nominating you. One of these people must already be an administrator, the other can be anyone. Once they have nominated you, the administrator must add the request onto the corresponding page. To learn more about the user rights, click here. When a request has been completed, successful or not, please archive it here. Admins Notice: When nominating someone, you should make a Level 2 Section with their name. This shows you what you need to type in. Please fill in the gaps correctly.
Nominee Notice: To be nominated, you must have a user nominate you an an administrator confirm the vote. The request will close after one week. The nominees with the most votes will go onto stage two of the voting process, and finally the final nominees will be voted with for the community. The nomination process is calculated by the number of for votes. If it is the highest number of for votes, it is classed as a 'pass'. Voters Notice: Please read the voting policy thorougly before you vote. You can only vote "For" and you can only vote for one user. If you decide to vote, you have to sign underneath the "For" heading. To do this you have to type this in: You may also leave a comment no longer than a sentence when you sign. Any longer and you have to leave it in the "Comments" section. After you have signed it, you must change the number in the brackets up by 1. (e.g. if it was at 3, it means 3 people have already signed it. Change it to 4 when you sign it.) This is also the same with the number by their name. If you vote for, you must also increase the number beside his name by 1. Please remember to use "#" instead of the usual "*", because it numbers the votes making it easier to count them. You can also remove your vote. If in any case you change your mind, do not remove your vote completely - just strike it out and move it to the back of the list. Remember to use an asterisk when moving it to the back of list, as it would not show up as a numbered point. |
Bureaucrat votes
Roger6881 (+4)
- Suggested by Callum Fawsitt and confirmed by Kallie Jo.
For (4)
Callum Fawsitt 
Yellow, k 
06:20, January 3, 2015 (UTC)- --Chunky! 09:58, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
OP is a llama!
Comments
- Roger is an experienced, kind, helpful user who is very active. I think he'll be a great Bcrat. --Chunky! 10:36, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
Hey.youcp (+4)
- Suggested and confirmed by Wolfgangs.
For (4)
- --Wolf-gangs (Talk) 05:22, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
- S h u r o w 05:30, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
- Kallie Jo (talk) 05:36, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
- Penguin-Pal (talk) 07:59, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
Comments
Administrator votes
Vicyorus (+3)
- Suggested by Chriskim98 and confirmed by Kallie Jo.
For (3)
- 00:31, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
- S h u r o w 05:30, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
- 12:46, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
Comments
- Vic isn't even a Patroller yet, so why would he become an Admin anyway? -EmberPrismDX-
- He was an admin before, and he suits perfectly for the admin position. Who else would be admin? 03:16, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
Watatsuki (+4)
- Suggested by Callum Fawsitt and confirmed by Kallie Jo.
For (4)
- Callum Fawsitt 00:31, January 3, 2015
- -EmberPrismDX-
- Yellow, k 06:20, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
- OP is a llama!
Comments
- Watatsuki is a very hard working contributor and he has been a very helpful user, so I think he should become an Admin. -EmberPrismDX-
Patroller votes
Chriskim98 (0)
For (1)
Comments
- I really do hope I can redeem myself with getting my rights back. As I have been editing at CPWN I do wish to edit at both wikis and help contribute both wikis out. I have been demoted for not editing but If I do get my rights back, I am hoping that I edit more like I did back in Jan and Feb 2014, and as well as be more active at the same time. With this, I do believe I do get my CM rights as well if this nomination passes. I have been a mod for a year, and I do think i have been doing pretty well. :P 00:28, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
C H U N K Y (+1)
For (1)
- Yellow, k 10:37, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
Comments
- I really miss being a patroller, and I hope to have my rights back sometime in the future. I think I would try to be more active as a patroller, and have a good experience of being one (I was patroller from April 2013 - July 2014 [Way over a year]) Hopefully you guys will vote for me :D --Chunky! 09:45, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
Chat moderator votes
EmberPrismDX (0)
For (0)
Comments
- Are you kidding me? This person doesn't meet the requirements. --Ninja (talk) Contribs Files 01:27, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
Yellowperson-Returns (+3)
For (3)
- Penguin-Pal (talk) 07:59, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
- OP is a llama!
- --Roger6881 (talk) 10:18, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
Comments
- Yellow is in chat a lot and i believe he can be a wonderful chatmod. Penguin-Pal (talk) 07:59, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
- As per above. OP is a llama!
- I have to agree with both Orange and Penguin-Pal, Yellow has displayed some really good knowledge of the policy and seems like a really friendly person. Good luck, Yellow. --Roger6881 (talk) 10:18, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
Penguin44eve (+1)
For (1)
- Yellow, k 10:14, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
Comments
OrangePuffle (+1)
For (1)
- Yellow, k 10:22, January 3, 2015 (UTC)