Club Penguin Wiki
Don't have an account?
Register
Advertisement
Register
Club Penguin Wiki
Club Penguin Wiki
10,487
pages

Club Penguin Wiki:January 2015 Promotions

Revision as of 17:32, 6 January 2015 by LukeLeia75 (talk | contribs) (→‎Green Ninja (+9))
View source

This page is to be used for the mass promotions of January 2015. There are four votes: administrator, bureaucrat, patroller, and chat moderator. There will be one winner for each vote. The votes began on January 3, and they will end on January 17. Admin and bureaucrat nominations will need to be confirmed by a current administrator. Prospective chat moderators and patrollers will nominate themselves for promotion. Each user will only be able to vote for one nominee in the admin and bureaucrat votes. In the mod and patroller votes, users will be allowed to vote for as many nominees as they want.
Please note: In addition to the regular rules of voting, we have decided to remove the rule stating that "chat moderators and patrollers are self-nominated" in substitution with a new rule: they can be nominated by peers as well as by themselves. Also, please note this: Two administrators will be promoted in these votes. As such, you may vote for two of the administrator candidates.

Bureaucrat votes

Roger6881 (+8)

Suggested by Callum Fawsitt and confirmed by Kallie Jo.

For (8)

  1. Fireworks Pin Callum Fawsitt Fireworks Pin 00:40, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Zomg its homer simpson from CP Yellow, k Zomg its homer simpson from CP 06:20, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
  3. --Chunky! 09:58, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
  4. 25px-5585102.png.jpg OP is a llama! 25px-5585102.png.jpg
  5. EEK you know it is Apj InterfaceShape52
  6. Rainbow Puffle7 Original Hey! It's your friend, Eve! Cheese Candy Cane Cane 15:41, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
  7. --THE RULER AND DICTATOR OF AWESOME HAS RETURNED!!!!! TALK TO HIM, OR ELSE! 17:57, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
  8. ɐɾuıN uǝǝɹפ (talk) 21:38, January 3, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

  • Roger is an experienced, kind, helpful user who is very active. I think he'll be a great Bcrat. --Chunky! 10:36, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
  • Roger really deserves to become the next Bureaucrat, he has performed amazingly over the past few weeks/months. As since it was so close a few months ago, I think he deserves the chance this time. Fireworks Pin Callum Fawsitt Fireworks Pin 13:58, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
  • He looks more for a bureaucrat because of his helpful edits. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mordelegal (talk • contribs • edit count)
  • I'm really sorry Hey.you, but Roger truly deserves this. ɐɾuıN uǝǝɹפ (talk) 21:38, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
  • Roger really deserves this a lot. ~The Jonie

Hey.youcp (+7)

Suggested and confirmed by Wolfgangs.

For (7)

  1. --FlagBahrainWolf-gangs (Talk) 05:22, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Christmas Scarf clothing icon ID 173 S h u r o w SantaHat 05:30, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Kallie Jo (talk) 05:36, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
  4. Penguin-Pal (talk) 07:59, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
  5. Jeserator HTTR! Football Pin 17:22, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
  6. Fireworks ImageGoodbye 2014, hello 2015 PartyFavorsPinJanuary 3, 2015
  7. TanCowboyHat
    Chriskim98
    TanCowboyHat 19:55, January 3, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

Administrator votes

Vicyorus (+8)

Suggested by Chriskim98 and confirmed by Kallie Jo.

For (8)

  1. TanCowboyHat
    Chriskim98
    TanCowboyHat 00:31, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Christmas Scarf clothing icon ID 173 S h u r o w SantaHat 05:30, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
  3. 12:46, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
  4. --Roger6881 (talk) 12:59, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
  5. Jeserator HTTR! Football Pin 17:22, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
  6. Fireworks ImageGoodbye 2014, hello 2015 PartyFavorsPinJanuary 3, 2015
  7. ɐɾuıN uǝǝɹפ (talk) 21:01, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
  8. Hey.youcp Surfboard Pin 22:32, January 3, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

  • Vic isn't even a Patroller yet, so why would he become an Admin anyway? -EmberPrismDX-
  • He was an admin before, and he suits perfectly for the admin position. Who else would be admin? TanCowboyHat
    Chriskim98
    TanCowboyHat 03:16, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
  • As much as I like both candidates as friends and editors, I think that Vic has just simply been on the wiki longer. Also, if we get Vic to an admin, we get another technocrat to help us with maintenance and management. --Roger6881 (talk) 12:59, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
  • I would like to give my two cents and say that Vicyorus is more ready to be an admin than Watatsuki. The latter has been rude to me and others in the past and simply does not have as much experience as Vic. ɐɾuıN uǝǝɹפ (talk) 21:01, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
  • It would be great to have both Vicyorus and Watatsuki as admins. --Hey.youcp Surfboard Pin 22:32, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
  • Woah, woah, woah. Vic isn't even a Patroller yet! I think he should work up the ranks.~The Jonie

Watatsuki (+9)

Suggested by Callum Fawsitt and confirmed by Kallie Jo.

For (9)

  1. --Fireworks Pin Callum Fawsitt Fireworks Pin 00:31, January 3, 2015
  2. --EmberPrismDX-
  3. --Zomg its homer simpson from CP Yellow, k Zomg its homer simpson from CP 06:20, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
  4. --25px-5585102.png.jpg OP is a llama! 25px-5585102.png.jpg
  5. --EEK you know it is Apj InterfaceShape52
  6. --Rainbow Puffle7 Original Hey! It's your friend, Eve! Cheese Candy Cane Cane 15:41, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
  7. --THE RULER AND DICTATOR OF AWESOME HAS RETURNED!!!!! TALK TO HIM, OR ELSE! 22:21, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
  8. --Hey.youcp Surfboard Pin 22:32, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
  9. --Llove Kuwait (Meow!) (Meow?) 07:02, January 5, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

  • Watatsuki is a very hard working contributor and he has been a very helpful user, so I think he should become an Admin. -EmberPrismDX-
  • He helped the wiki so much and have so many edits. He totally deserve this #Watatsuki4Admin Rainbow Puffle7 Original Hey! It's your friend, Eve! Cheese Candy Cane Cane 15:41, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
  • Now i will be the bad guy he edited thats true but i guess no ones care that he joined on 2014 making even older than he and in fact how it is that user with other users begin admin is not only for the edits is also for how you are --Ecpg (talk) 15:55, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
  • What are you talking about? o_o Are you saying if he joined on 2014 he shouldn't become a admin? Rainbow Puffle7 Original Hey! It's your friend, Eve! Cheese Candy Cane Cane 16:37, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
  • Both Watat and Vic are very good users. Vicyorus is very qualified for the admin position due to his previous stint, but I think that Watatsuki is more suited for the role, given the sheer number of edits that he has made recently.--THE RULER AND DICTATOR OF AWESOME HAS RETURNED!!!!! TALK TO HIM, OR ELSE! 22:21, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
  • Watat is good at editing and suits well for admin.~The Jonie
  • YESSSS! #Watatsuki4Admin is real! Llove Kuwait (Meow!) (Meow?) 07:02, January 5, 2015 (UTC)

Callum Fawsitt (+1)

Suggested and confirmed by Awesome335

For (1)

  1. --THE RULER AND DICTATOR OF AWESOME HAS RETURNED!!!!! TALK TO HIM, OR ELSE! 22:21, January 3, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

Patroller votes

Chriskim98 (+8)

For (8)

  1. --25px-5585102.png.jpg OP is a llama! 25px-5585102.png.jpg
  2. --Snowball *throws snowball at ThatYoshi8* Wait, I'm ThatYoshi8. Tee hee. 15:54, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
  3. --Cheese Pin i liek cheez Cheese Pin 16:32, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
  4. --Jeserator HTTR! Football Pin 17:22, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
  5. --Fireworks ImageGoodbye 2014, hello 2015 PartyFavorsPinJanuary 3, 2015
  6. -- 20:40, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
  7. --Kallie Jo (talk) 01:41, January 4, 2015 (UTC)
  8. --Llove Kuwait (Meow!) (Meow?) 07:02, January 5, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

  • I really do hope I can redeem myself with getting my rights back. As I have been editing at CPWN I do wish to edit at both wikis and help contribute both wikis out. I have been demoted for not editing but If I do get my rights back, I am hoping that I edit more like I did back in Jan and Feb 2014, and as well as be more active at the same time. With this, I do believe I do get my CM rights as well if this nomination passes. I have been a mod for a year, and I do think i have been doing pretty well. :P TanCowboyHat
    Chriskim98
    TanCowboyHat 00:28, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
    • Just a question for you Chris, if you are promoted to patroller again, will you focus more on editing CPWN or editing here? :P --Rowboat PinDps04talk 17:36, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
  • I'm not voting for a user who swore at an admin and who was demoted under a week ago. EEK you know it is Apj InterfaceShape52
  • all hail chris, loljk Snowball *throws snowball at ThatYoshi8* Wait, I'm ThatYoshi8. Tee hee. 15:54, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
  • Apj, Roger allowed it therefore at his own risk, allowed the swear in PM. We have discussed it over again and we have solved the issue. I was demoted specifically from Patroller to CM due to my lack of edits, but as I have said earlier in my comment that I will try to edit more and be more active on both CPW and CPWN. TanCowboyHat
    Chriskim98
    TanCowboyHat 15:57, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
  • He did not allow it. I don't want to get into this here. EEK you know it is Apj InterfaceShape52
  • When i said "Can i say something mean and rude, he said "Ok". Therefore allowing it. TanCowboyHat
    Chriskim98
    TanCowboyHat 16:01, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
  • I think Chris is the best candidate and option in this category.
  • Despite the controversy lately, I do think Chris is a well qualified patroller. I believe he has learned from his punishment and should be given a second chance. --Jeserator HTTR! Football Pin 17:22, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
  • Voting for only because he shouldn't have had his rights taken away in the first place. 20:40, January 3, 2015 (UTC)

C H U N K Y (+2)

For (2)

  1. Zomg its homer simpson from CP Yellow, k Zomg its homer simpson from CP 10:37, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Samantas5855 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Samantas5855 (talk • contribs • edit count)

Comments

  • I really miss being a patroller, and I hope to have my rights back sometime in the future. I think I would try to be more active as a patroller, and have a good experience of being one (I was patroller from April 2013 - July 2014 [Way over a year]) Hopefully you guys will vote for me :D --Chunky! 09:45, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
  • Honestly, you were very inactive, and even now you are still inactive. I havent seen you edit in a long time either so I dont see how you can be a patroller. I do still think you should be a CM but otherwise I dont know yet if you should be a patroller once again. TanCowboyHat
    Chriskim98
    TanCowboyHat 15:26, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
  • Yes, but since I was demoted, I have lost the need to edit. If I was promoted, I would have a reason to be active again. --Chunky! 16:22, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
  • You deserve it C H U N K Y, I think you should get your rights back.~The Jonie
    • I think people should help the wiki even when they don't have rights. That's not a very good reason, IMO. ɐɾuıN uǝǝɹפ (talk) 21:38, January 3, 2015 (UTC)

Green Ninja (+10)

Suggested and confirmed by Awesome335

For (9)

  1. --THE RULER AND DICTATOR OF AWESOME HAS RETURNED!!!!! TALK TO HIM, OR ELSE! 17:54, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
  2. EEK you know it is Apj InterfaceShape52
  3. --Roger6881 (talk) 19:47, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
  4. Fireworks Pin Callum Fawsitt Fireworks Pin 20:01, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
  5. -EmberPrismDX-
  6. Hey.youcp Surfboard Pin 22:07, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
  7. Kallie Jo (talk) 01:41, January 4, 2015 (UTC)
  8. Christmas Scarf clothing icon ID 173 S h u r o w SantaHat 06:47, January 5, 2015 (UTC)
  9. Cheese Pin i liek cheez Cheese Pin 01:55, January 6, 2015 (UTC)
  10. LukeLeia75 (talk) 17:32, January 6, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

  • Green Ninja is an active user who has made many constructive edits. He has over 20,000. While the other nominees are very good candidates, I think that it may be too soon for Chris following his demotion, while Chunky has not been editing very much recently. --THE RULER AND DICTATOR OF AWESOME HAS RETURNED!!!!! TALK TO HIM, OR ELSE! 17:54, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
  • I agree with everything Awesome said. He is a very good editor. EEK you know it is Apj InterfaceShape52
  • GN honestly makes a lot of pointless edits, but some being good. TanCowboyHat
    Chriskim98
    TanCowboyHat 18:10, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
    • I will say that this is NOT true. I just make rare mistakes, all of which I have learned from. However, I would have never thought that I'd be nominated! I thank you all for that. I won't let any of you down if I win. ɐɾuıN uǝǝɹפ (talk) 21:01, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
    • I have to disagree, a majority of Green Ninja's edits have been very constructive; most of them being for new characters/items/events. Just look at his editcount and contributions, all most all of his edits feature fixing spelling, adding info, pictures, (and maybe a reference). I don't think you commenting on what's wrong with a candidate without a valid reason is fairer then you commenting on why you should be the candidate with a good reason. But, please, keep it civil on the vote pages. Pitch yourselves for what you are. And have fun. --Roger6881 (talk) 10:30, January 4, 2015 (UTC)
  • I want to even out the playing field a little bit, and I think the best way to do it is to the vote for who I think has shown the most usefulness for these rights. Green Ninja has displayed editing excellence in the past as well as displaying voracious editing tendencies; such as when a new party comes out (what are really the most fundamental times for an editor to be active). Taking note of this, we can see that Green Ninja could use his new "powers" to edit these pages and patroll others to build articles up from when they were first released. Sure, he may still need some learing with references (we will master ref names together, GN!) and previous offences to the policy, while I can't deny are "easy", are a learning curve in every editor's journey. So, why don't we give it to a new person for once? Give them a chance, eh? --Roger6881 (talk) 19:47, January 3, 2015 (UTC)

Chat moderator votes

EmberPrismDX (+3)

I am active on chat a lot and I'm a nice user, also I have exactly 50 edits and I know all the rules of the Chat Policy so I think I would be qualified for Chat Mod, does anybody agree with me?

For (3)

  1. User:WikiaFrog
  2. Fireworks ImageGoodbye 2014, hello 2015 PartyFavorsPinJanuary 3, 2015
  3. ɐɾuıN uǝǝɹפ (talk) 21:48, January 3, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

  • Are you kidding me? This person doesn't meet the requirements. --Ninja (talk) Contribs Files 01:27, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
    • Can you tell me what requirements she does not meet? --Roger6881 (talk) 15:50, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
  • uhhhh.... She's new, it's not the right time for her to have a right, she needs to be trusted, she's only been here for a week and a half. I'm sure she can be capable, but her trust is unknown. She's just new, give me another month or two, though it can be acceptable.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Titanium Ninja (talk • contribs • edit count)
  • If Callum Fawsitt can be promoted to a moderator 20 days after joining, then she could be promoted a month after. She is friendly, has lots of edits, and is very active. I think she'd make a great moderator, I'm just afraid that she might become too serious and controlling after being promoted like other users.—Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiaFrog (talk • contribs • edit count)
    • That was the Chat Mod Calender. He was fully promoted in a few months later. EEK you know it is Apj InterfaceShape52
  • I think she could be good. ɐɾuıN uǝǝɹפ (talk) 21:48, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
  • As Titanium stated, this user has only been on the wiki for a little longer than a week. --Hey.youcp Surfboard Pin 22:07, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
  • Not to be rude but SERIOUSLY?? People worked hard to get mod right for a year or more than a year just to get mod, and he just joined a week and he can be a mod? I know he edit a lot and active but I think we need to give him few months to prove his trustworthiness. I am sorry but I think he just too early for that kind of right.. Rainbow Puffle7 Original Hey! It's your friend, Eve! Cheese Candy Cane Cane 06:04, January 4, 2015 (UTC)
  • *she. See that? you're judging her and you don't even know who the hell she is.
  • Who is this? 22:36, January 4, 2015 (UTC)
  • What the hell? She is good for chat mod, but she needs more time. But it will be impossible if she gets the rights. One person shouldn't just get the rights automatically. They need to be known to be responsible and trustworthy, like I am. She shouldn't be one week old and get a right.~The Jonie

Yellowperson-Returns (+8)

For (8)

  1. Penguin-Pal (talk) 07:59, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
  2. 25px-5585102.png.jpg OP is a llama! 25px-5585102.png.jpg
  3. --Roger6881 (talk) 10:18, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
  4. Fireworks Pin Callum Fawsitt Fireworks Pin 14:27, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
  5. --THE RULER AND DICTATOR OF AWESOME HAS RETURNED!!!!! TALK TO HIM, OR ELSE! 17:55, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
  6. Hey.youcp Surfboard Pin 22:07, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
  7. Kallie Jo (talk) 01:41, January 4, 2015 (UTC)
  8. ɐɾuıN uǝǝɹפ (talk) 16:59, January 6, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

  • Yellow is in chat a lot and i believe he can be a wonderful chatmod. Penguin-Pal (talk) 07:59, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
  • As per above. 25px-5585102.png.jpg OP is a llama! 25px-5585102.png.jpg
  • I have to agree with both Orange and Penguin-Pal, Yellow has displayed some really good knowledge of the policy and seems like a really friendly person. Good luck, Yellow. --Roger6881 (talk) 10:18, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
  • Yellow deserves the Chat Mod rights. I have seen him be Chat Mod and is very good at his duties.~The Jonie

Penguin44eve (+1)

For (1)

  1. Zomg its homer simpson from CP Yellow, k Zomg its homer simpson from CP 10:14, January 3, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

OrangePuffle (+1)

For (1)

  1. Zomg its homer simpson from CP Yellow, k Zomg its homer simpson from CP 19:57, January 3, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

Titanium Ninja (+1)

For

  1. ɐɾuıN uǝǝɹפ (talk) 01:34, January 6, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

  • As people may think I'm a bit 'wacky' on chat, and thinking that I get kicked daily. You got that right, I do go a bit wild. But listen to the fact: this wiki needs mods. Now that a lot of users moved on to a new right, or some quit. I AM a good option and candidate. I may be saying 'oh I'm the best', but I am probably one of the. Moving on, my account is going to be a year old on Friday. For the past year, I've been working a bit. I have plenty of edits, although that is something involved with rollback. I am pretty active on chat, usually I'm on from 8 AM to at least 10PM in PST (I do take a few breaks, or AFK for a while). I do not know what other requirements I have not met. Surely, I have been banned and blocked for a couple of times, but does that matter? History is at itself. I am capable for this job, like the other nominees. I am planning to make 2015 the best year it can with my possible future given powers. I'm on usually at night, where mods nor admins are on. Invader or sockpuppets might possibly come on (this happened once), and it'll all be a mess until if a VSTF or staff is called. Now from all this, you may be thinking I am a bit 'eager' for this pair of rights, though I am, but means nothing I will abuse them, do the same things I used to do like spamming, excessive caps, etc. Anyways, I hope this is acceptable. Vote for da ninja! Cheese Pin i liek cheez Cheese Pin 01:16, January 6, 2015 (UTC)
    • I'd hate to be a damper on the parade, here, but the chat ban log is important; playing an important part in determining whether you are qualified for the job. I'm not denying you're an "old" who is active, but the point stands that you have been banned from chat – the latest having just expired today (January 6th) following numerous bans/warnings of bad behaviour and other violations of our chat policy. I'm not trying to discourage anyone from voting for you; but to me, it seems that we can't have a chat moderator who does not seem to understand our rules and regulations. Sorry if I hurt anyone personally during this comment, but that's just my two cents on this whole thing. --Roger6881 (talk) 16:04, January 6, 2015 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.
Advertisement