This page is for requesting user rights for a user.
There are 3 types of user rights in this wiki: rollback, administrator and bureaucrat. You can request to receive these user rights via two people nominating you. One of these people must already be an administrator, the other can be anyone. Once they have nominated you, the administrator must add the request onto the corresponding page. To learn more about the user rights, click here.
When a request has been completed, successful or not, please archive it here.
Admins Notice: When nominating someone, you should make a Level 2 Section with their name. This shows you what you need to type in. Please fill in the gaps correctly.
==<Nominee name> (0)==
Nominated by <your name> and <other nominater>.
===For (0)===
===Against (0)===
===Comments ===
Nominee Notice: After being nominated, you can enter reasons on why you should be nominated next to the "nomination sentence". Your requestautomatically closes after 2 weeks. To be successful, you must have a vote difference of +7. A vote difference is calculated by the amount of "for" votes subtracted by the amount of "against" votes. Furthermore, 2 sysops must have voted for if the nomination is successful.
Voters Notice: Please read the voting policy thorougly before you vote.
You must vote in either "For" or "Against". If you vote in for, you have to sign underneath the "For" heading. To do this you have to type this in:
#~~~~
You may also leave a comment no longer than a sentence when you sign. Any longer and you have to leave it in the "Comments" section.
After you have signed it, you must change the number in the brackets up by 1. (e.g. if it was at 3, it means 3 people have already signed it. Change it to 4 when you sign it.) This is also the same with the number by their name. If you vote for, you must also increase the number beside his name by 1.
Please remember to use "#" instead of the usual "*", because it numbers the votes making it easier to count them.
You can also remove your vote. If in any case you change your mind, do not remove your vote completely, just strike it out and move it to the back of the list. Remember to use an asterik when moving it to the back of list, as it would not show up as a numbered point.
Your request must be added in one of these sections:
Rollback requests
Use Club Penguin Wiki:Requests for Rollback
Administrator requests
Staffan15 (+13)
Nominated by Tigernose and Hat Pop. Staffan15 was chosen for the new admin spot after numerous discussions. We feel that Staffan needs the right more than ever, constantly reporting pages that need to be deleted, and it sometimes even a chore for Staffan to report and for us to do because he has such a great eye for maintenance.
Please do not vote against because you were not chosen, all against votes without a valid reason (the aforementioned is not a valid reason) will be removed. Thanks.
For (13)
- --Tigernose
Chat • Edits 15:40, August 12, 2010 (UTC) - --ClubPenguinMaster Talk to zee master! 15:44, August 12, 2010 (UTC)
- Why not? GGD Curse you Perry the Platy- Wait, is that Love Handel? 16:59, August 12, 2010 (UTC)
- Dude you used to have adminship, you rocked at it. Have it again :D --Would you like your <perry noise> with or without fromage? 17:00, August 12, 2010 (UTC)
- DO IT --Zapwire (dial the waaaambulance) 17:04, August 12, 2010 (UTC)
- It sounds like a good idea--Cp kid 17:59, August 12, 2010 (UTC)
- YES,YES, AND YES!! EDFan12345 Don't roast them!•You gotta Flambé 'em!•See meh Edits 19:55, August 12, 2010 (UTC)
- Had adminship experience previously, so yes. --LordMaster96 Talk! 19:56, August 12, 2010 (UTC)
- Of course!It sounds that he would be a perfect administrator!Dionnefamily 21:40, August 12, 2010 (UTC)
- I'm all for it! I hope he's following this page. That way, he know's if he's winning (if you are, put it on my talk page)! I have all the pins! So what? - bigpboy 01:00, August 13, 2010 (UTC)
- ♫Ellyppi♫ Talk 2 me! | My edits! | Check out my blog! 09:36, August 13, 2010 (UTC)
- Good idea -Christopoll 12:39, August 13, 2010 (UTC)
- Staffen has a good reputation so I would agree with him becoming an admin. Fury is voting in France!
- Staffan15 is very nice, even if he's inactive a good heart is better than inactivity! :) --Jeffwang16 (Talk) (Contributions) (Email me!) 02:42, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
Against (0)
Comments
- Neutral at the moment, I feel like I was purposely not informed or included in these claimed "discussions" that took place. Staffan would make a good admin, but sometimes I feel like he could improve his attitude to others at times. Please do not start yelling at me with "OMG SEAHORSE STFU", I am allowed to give my opinion. --Seahorseruler (Talk Page) (Contribs) 21:06, August 12, 2010 (UTC)
- You are entitled to your opinion. It's just that one time you were away on IRC and Staffan was on IRC and he kept on sending us pages for us to delete. It's a chore for all of us, and it was really time to give him the adminship. --Tigernose Chat • Edits 12:06, August 13, 2010 (UTC)
- I am neutral too! I rarely see Staffan15 online and last time he was admin, he never really used his powers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brookelas (talk • contribs • edit count)
- Staffan is online most of the time, trust me, he's always on IRC. And that was last time, this is this time - and he really needs them. I really can't think of a reason against him. --Tigernose Chat • Edits 17:35, August 13, 2010 (UTC)
- Tigernose, I thought you said NOONE NEEDS POWERS... Anyways, he never used his powers last time, so I am still neutral. Although, he is a VERY nice user! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brookelas (talk • contribs • edit count)
- Please sign your edits for one. Secondly, I never said that, or if I meant something like that I never said it like that, or vice versa... --Tigernose
Chat • Edits 22:13, August 13, 2010 (UTC) - I don't know. I agree that he should get them, but, I agree with Brookelas. It's a matter of who deserves them, and does Staffan? I just don't know... Bacon777 Sizzle the Bacon 23:45, August 13, 2010 (UTC)
TurtleShroom
Not as an attempt to revert policies or overthrow the communist regime, but sipmy to give back the position I was guarenteed to keeep after my demotion. With Robbsi, V-Rex, and Barkjon, I BUILT THIS SITE. No one knows me, but without me, you wouldn't be here.
I feel cheated and frauded as the CPFW withers away while you guys recieve a million hits and FIVE NEW USERS A DAY, according to Seahorse.
- As a comrade here, I will:
- Categorize random stuff using my vast knowledge.
- Preserve, restore, and archive our site's glorious history.
- Demand that old userpages of famous legends be kept in their pre-coup state for history.
- Help foster a cultural awareness of the past, so that everyone can know that a Webmaster was, what Top Agent did, why each Crisis was important, and the steps that made the site what it is today.
- Preserve and enforce the IRC Pact with Joeyaa. The pact included preservation of site history, allowing for subpages to exist, and that no unuse dimages would EVER EVER EVER be deleted.
- Serve as a curator and historian for a site museum.
- Give the CPFW a proper advertisement with consent from your real government. It isn't fair that a site I put so much into building refuses to advertise a partner. We are partners and should encourage EACH OTHER'S GROWTH.
- Restore iconic templates and such for archival purposes alone, placing them on a musueum page and not using them in general.
- With my power, I will not:
- Remove policies.
- Actually and directly govern the site.
- Str00delize.
- Delete other people's work.
- Block people.
- Tamper with elections.
- Vote in core policies.
- Whine about the current regime.
- Use anything I restore or alter for anything outside of historical preservation.
- Try and change the regime back.
- Meddle with the main space.
- Become a bureaucrat.
- My activity will be:
- Passive.
- Sparse.
- Under the radar.
- Legal.
- Not affect the main goals of the website or its current regime
- Small.
- Rare.
- In short spurts.
- Not involve the main space (AKA where I don't belong).
- You should approve my vote because:
- I spent years of my life helping this site. Without me, this wouldn't exist.
- I was cheated. My agreement was to relenquish Bureaucrat status. I was allowed to remain a permanent sysop.
- Our site's history is being deleted and whitewashed. It must be preserved in its full by someone who knows the old website by heart.
- There are so many fun goodies and Webmaster secrets that know one knows, but should.
- No one knows me, and they should. They should also know Robbsi, V-Rex, and Barkjon.
- I was a bureaucrat on this site and I had an excellent track record, even though I was dramatic. I was praised for my governing and recieved dozens upon dozens of awards.
- I am a master censor. I see swears and filth and remove them with ease. Seahorse used a swearing acronym just a while ago. Did you see it? No? I did! I also know how and when to hide a comment, and there are a LOT of bad comments in blogs.
- I am respected by those who remember me, and I've heard many want to meet me. (Beware: my CP penguin is silent because I can't work the text boxes. I'm not ignoring you, I can only respond with pre-accepted messages because "cook" and "wiki" and everything I would say is blocked.)
- I love editing and want to boost my account that mysteriously fell. I firmly remember having well over five thousand edits.
- I used to rule you. You should respect all I did for you.
- I helped build this site.
- It's unfair that I am silenced. I was a founder of the site. I need to be respected!
TURTLESHROOM FOR CURATOR! Let me in, and i will become a minor archivist, saving hostory and keeping the old CPW in the background for viewing purposes!
--† TurtleShroom™! Jesus Loves You and Died for You!! † :) :) {{subst:template:TSSIGNATURE}} 03:03, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
For
Against
- -Tigernose
- -Seahorseruler
- User hasn't been around for too long to be familiar with policies and standards. Needs to spend more time consecutively active to be a good sysop. — Joey aa 03:07, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
Commentary
Bureaucrat requests
Bureaucrat requests are currently closed.