The Wiki's Vote Page is made to hold all kinds of votes.
When a vote is held, you will be allowed to sign your username, using four tildes ~~~~
Each vote will be published in this way:
==<Vote name> (0)== :Suggested by <your name> and confirmed by <administrator name> ===For (0)=== ===Against (0)=== ===Comments===
Nominee Notice: After being nominated, you can enter reasons on why you should be nominated next to the "nomination sentence". A vote closes when 14 days is up. The vote difference is calculated by the number of votes "for" subtracted by the number "against". The user option with the most vote differences wins.
Voter Notice: You must vote in either "For" or "Against". If you vote in for, you have to sign underneath the "For" heading. To do this you have to type this in:
#~~~~
After you have signed it, you must change the number in the brackets up by 1. (e.g if it was at 3, it means 3 people have already signed it. Change it to 4 when you sign it.) This is also the same with the number by their name. If you vote for, you must also increase the number beside his or her name by 1.
Please remember to use "#" instead of the usual "*", because it numbers the votes making it easier to count them.
You can also remove your vote. If in any case you change your mind, do not remove your vote completely, just strike it out and move it to the back of the list.
Have "Item of the Month" on this wiki (+2)
- Suggested by Mariocart25 and confirmed by Penguin-Pal Vote ends on November 29, 2013
For (7)
- Mariocart25 05:30, November 15, 2013 (UTC)
- Penguin-Pal (talk) 05:36, November 15, 2013 (UTC)
- Kallie Jo (talk) 12:44, November 15, 2013 (UTC)
- 01:00, November 16, 2013 (UTC)
- Dps04talk
- -- Sugar wishes Club Penguin a very happy ANNIVERSARY!! 07:51, November 16, 2013 (UTC)
- -- JWPengie sees the gold puffle! 12:58, November 16, 2013 (UTC)
Against (5)
- CK Need help? 05:10, November 16, 2013 (UTC)
- -Berry 15:00, November 16, 2013 (UTC)
- Wolf-gangs (talk) 10:39, November 22, 2013 (UTC)
- 11:36, November 22, 2013 (UTC)
- S h u r o w 04:03, November 25, 2013 (UTC)
- You,have found all my edits 03:27, November 30, 2013 (UTC)
Comments
- I like this idea. We should have IOTM, and I came up with it lol. Mariocart25 05:30, November 15, 2013 (UTC)
- 'IOTM' lol. Same here. I hope that there wouldn't be too many disputes due to varieties. Penguin-Pal (talk) 05:36, November 15, 2013 (UTC)
- There's so many items on CP. So many... Mariocart25 00:29, November 16, 2013 (UTC)
- Very awesome idea! 01:00, November 16, 2013 (UTC)
- Imo featured user, article and image are plenty enough. Plus, there are like 3,000+ items on CP right, and the amount is growing every day. CK Need help? 05:10, November 16, 2013 (UTC)
- ....I support this...enough said. -- Sugar wishes Club Penguin a very happy ANNIVERSARY!! 07:51, November 16, 2013 (UTC)
- Go ITOM! :D -- JWPengie sees the gold puffle! 12:58, November 16, 2013 (UTC)
- *IOTM Mariocart25<--- My first pin 18:54, November 16, 2013 (UTC)
- It kinda seems pointless. POTM and FA are related to the wiki at least, and honor users and articles, but a featured item would be stupid. It isn't exactly the greatest concept to me. -Berry 15:00, November 16, 2013 (UTC)
- My point exactly. CK Need help? 07:10, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
- Super Miron likes this.
- Well, I don't think it is a good idea to add such votes :/. They are rather less interesting than POTM, FA and FI. Plus, we will be honoring items? What will that get us to? I think the current three activities are rather enough for us and adding more is just a waste of time. But, if you would suggest a more interesting activity than this, then I won't mind. I think all who voted for must think again before voting and this idea is rather meaningless and must be added in Club Penguin Site NOT Club Penguin Wiki! I haven't explained many of my points, I want to avoid debates now. Wolf-gangs (talk) 10:39, November 22, 2013 (UTC)
- Yeah, I agree. -- MiXeR23*1 (Messages!) 11:59, November 22, 2013 (UTC)
- Not really, iotm can be related to both club penguin and club penguin wiki. Usually all the featured articles selected are based on a party or phenomenon in cp rather than an item, primarily because usually these articles are much more detailed than item articles. So, under the current Featured Article Framework, there can hardly be an article featuring an item gaining the title of FA. By adding an IOTM, we can encourage user to select the best item article, hopefully promoting these articles to the community and encouraging contribution. Also, i guess it would not really hurt if we give it a try, will it? Lets see how IOTM turns out before hastily drawing a conclusion that IOTM must be much less intersting than POTM, FA and FI. --Dps04talk 12:17, November 22, 2013 (UTC)