The Wiki's Vote Page is made to hold all kinds of votes.
When a vote is held, you will be allowed to sign your username, using four tildes ~~~~
Each vote will be published in this way:
==<Vote name> (0)== :Suggested by <your name> and confirmed by <administrator name> ===For (0)=== ===Against (0)=== ===Comments===
Nominee Notice: After being nominated, you can enter reasons on why you should be nominated next to the "nomination sentence". A vote closes when 14 days is up. The vote difference is calculated by the number of votes "for" subtracted by the number "against". The user option with the most vote differences wins.
Voter Notice: You must vote in either "For" or "Against". If you vote in for, you have to sign underneath the "For" heading. To do this you have to type this in:
#~~~~
After you have signed it, you must change the number in the brackets up by 1. (e.g. if it was at 3, it means 3 people have already signed it. Change it to 4 when you sign it.) This is also the same with the number by their name. If you vote for, you must also increase the number beside his or her name by 1.
Please remember to use "#" instead of the usual "*", because it numbers the votes making it easier to count them.
You can also remove your vote. If in any case you change your mind, do not remove your vote completely, just strike it out and move it to the back of the list.
Use Template For Voting (-1)
I think instead of the current system, which looks like this.
==<Vote name> (0)== :Suggested by <your name> and confirmed by <administrator name> ===For (0)=== ===Against (0)=== ===Comments===
We should use a template, similar to this
{{Vote
|Name =
|Nominee =
|Confirming Admin =
|For =
|Against =
|Comments =
}}
For the For/Against/Comment places, we could use <br>*test<br>*test2, so watcha think?
For (4)
AustinD-3 (Talk) (Blog) 
JONNN CENNAA!!! 
21:18, January 13, 2016 (UTC)- i like cheez 18:33, January 17, 2016 (UTC)WikiaFrog
- Sleet The Rare Server! 14:25, January 18, 2016 (UTC)
Against (5)
- Hey.youcp 13:40, January 5, 2016 (UTC)
- Samantas5855 (talk) 18:34, January 10 2016 (PST)
- you know it is Apj
- Callum Fawsitt (talk) 19:02, January 18, 2016 (UTC)
- --Chunky! 20:02, January 18, 2016 (UTC)
Comments
- I see no problem with the current system. Besides, mashing together names and comments in a template just... is not at all practical. What would be the supposed benefit of this? –Watatsuki 23:44, January 4, 2016 (UTC)
- I don't think this is needed. you know it is Apj
- It has potential to look neater than the current system for voting, but it'll likely just end up being more trouble than it's worth.
*Adding a line break and then an asterisk or number sign also doesn't translate to a list.
#It's a cool idea, but I think the current system works well enough. --Hey.youcp 13:40, January 5, 2016 (UTC) - I agree with Watatsuki, how would we organise the for, against and comment sections into one template? The current system has worked for many years, why change it? --Chunky! 20:02, January 18, 2016 (UTC)
