Club Penguin Wiki
Don't have an account?
Register
Advertisement
Register
Club Penguin Wiki
Club Penguin Wiki
10,487
pages

Club Penguin Wiki:Wall of Fame/nominations

< Club Penguin Wiki:Wall of Fame
Revision as of 23:47, 11 June 2010 by Zapwire (talk | contribs) (→‎Comments)
Sign in to edit

The Wall of Fame lists our greatest users, past and present. They've all contributed greatly to this wiki and with their ideas and edits they have made a massive change to this wiki. Only the best will be up here and if you think you deserve to be on the Wall, you can be nominated here. The new system ensures a fair vote on who should be put on, and was voted on here.

You have to be nominated by one person to become a nominee. The nomination must be confirmed with an administrator before you place it on the nomination list.

You cannot nominate yourself.

Nominater Notice: When nominating someone, you should make a Level 2 Section with their name. This shows you what you need to type in. Please fill in the gaps correctly. Before nominating them, please notify them with a message on the talk page. If they accept, continue.


==<Nominee name> (0)==
Nominated by <your name> and confirmed by <administrator's name>
===For (0)===
===Against (0)===
===Comments ===

Nominee Notice: After being nominated, you can enter reasons on why you should be nominated next to the "nomination sentence". A nomination closes when 14 days is up. The vote difference is calculated by the number of votes "for" you, subtracted by the number "against". If you do not reach a 10 vote difference in when the 14 days is up your nomination will be closed.

Voters Notice: You must vote in either "For" or "Against". If you vote in for, you have to sign underneath the "For" heading. To do this you have to type this in:
#~~~~

After you have signed it, you must change the number in the brackets up by 1. (e.g if it was at 3, it means 3 people have already signed it. Change it to 4 when you sign it.) This is also the same with the number by their name. If you vote for, you must also increase the number beside his name by 1.

Please remember to use "#" instead of the usual "*", because it numbers the votes making it easier to count them.

You can also remove your vote. If in any case you change your mind, do not remove your vote completely, just strike it out and move it to the back of the list.

Zapwire (+21)

Nominated and confirmed by Tigernose. Guys, we forgot about Zapwire! Clearly one of our all-time greats, this wiki will be so different without him. The ambox system, the userbox system, the news system, the mainpage basis... he's pretty much thought up, designed and created every community-based thing on this wiki!

For (21)

  1. Per above. --Tigernose Tigernose Chat • Edits 23:51, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
  2. :)Jelloratbob:) My talk page | My edits 23:57, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
  3. He's a good friend and one that worked hard on this wiki.--CatZip888 00:16, June 4, 2010 (UTC)
  4. He has made a huge difference. :) POLKIE1 00:23, June 4, 2010 (UTC)
  5. I think he deserves it. He helped me post my blog posts on the Main Page on my old account before. --LordMaster96 Talk to me! 02:27, June 4, 2010 (UTC)
  6. ZW has helped the wiki in many ways, from template making to idea planning, he deserves to be in the wall of fame. In fact, he should have been on there a LONG time ago! --Hal Homsar Solo | TALK HERE | Escargots here 05:49, June 4, 2010 (UTC)
  7. An amazing editor. Truly deserves this. Burpy678A glove being punched?!Now that is IRONY! 10:04, June 4, 2010 (UTC)
  8. He should of been on here before I even joined! See his edits! They are truley amazing! Gary the Gaget Dude Wanna talk? • Contribs 12:29, June 4, 2010 (UTC)
  9. I vote here cause he's an edit-a-lot and a edit-well kind of person I know. Getting back to the basics eh...Heelo Hello ? 9:42, June 4, 2010 (UTC)
  10. Alright! I voted against, but I changed my mind. --Sonic The Hedgehog (Talk | Blog | Contribs) 13:13, June 4, 2010 (UTC)
  11. I am sorta neutral. He was a little mean to me, but he told me a lot about Linux. So I would go for neutral, but there is no neutral catergory, so I am sticking with YES. 24.98.152.127 21:49, June 4, 2010 (UTC)
  12. --seahorseruler |Talk (EditCount) Yoshi! 22:14, June 4, 2010 (UTC)
  13. He's a good editor and should be introduced to the wall of fame. WittlePenguin 01:27, June 5, 2010 (UTC) WittlePenguin
  14. Yeah! He's done a heap of things! He deserves it! Well done Zap! I know you're going to win! --Will k
  15. Sometimes, Zapwire can lose his temper, but otherwise he'd be a GREAT candidate for the WoF. --Alxeedo TALK 13:55, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
  16. Per the text above. --Staffan15 (talk|contribs) 21:11, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
  17. I am with ya Zapwire!!! -Fawful is voting! ^_^
  18. Totally. ZAP IS AWESOME!!!-- Barkjon  Complaints here! 00:46, June 7, 2010 (UTC)
  19. Okay, I'm sorry about voting against before, but, YA!
  20. Sorry about everything before Zapwire I know I was wrong so friends?Mvtech(Talk|Blog) 06:49, June 9, 2010 (UTC)
  21. He has done a lot for the wiki Dancing Penguin 11:03, June 9, 2010 (UTC)
  22. Of course! --$harkbate Talk2Meh 19:51, June 9, 2010 (UTC)

Against (0)

  • 10000000000% no. Ozone101 23:53, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
  • Sorry Zapwire I was supose to choose for but I'm scared of you!Mvtech 04:38, June 4, 2010 (UTC)

  • Hmmmm, I'm not really sure that just because he's an admin, he should be put on the Wall of Fame. Maybe he should do something really really good? I don't know. --Sonic The Hedgehog (Talk | Blog | Contribs) 13:11, June 4, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Why? You have to give a reason Ozone. There's such thing as a Voting policy that requires to give a reason for against votes. --Tigernose Tigernose Chat • Edits 23:57, June 3, 2010 (UTC)

The only reason why I think is because I told him he'd be a bad sysop. --Zapwire (talk/blog/edits) 09:47, June 4, 2010 (UTC)
Exacly. Infact, I'll not vote at all then. Ozone101 Talk 2 Meh! 23:59, June 4, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, if you want to vote against it at least you should give a good reason! POLKIE1 00:22, June 4, 2010 (UTC)

I really am sorry Zapwire but I am really scared of you,you gave me a message in my talk page that made me scared of you how ever I was just having fun!Mvtech 06:25, June 4, 2010 (UTC)

I'm stern and strict if you do make me angry, which you did. Breaking the policy is not fun, maybe it is in your demented little world where the policy doesn't mean anything, but it does in reality. --Zapwire (talk/blog/edits) 09:43, June 4, 2010 (UTC)
I don't have any "demented little world where the plolicy doesn't mean anything" only girls and babys have that plus you don't understand me I don't know where s IRcMvtech 11:35, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
Ozone,just because he said you'd be a bad sysop (which you would,because you threatan to quit,no offence) doesn't mean you have to be harsh and vote against. In my opinions,ZW is trying hard to get on WoF. He has amazing edits,he is onne of the most active administrators,and is verry nice (though strict at times). Zapwire,you have my "For" vote. Gary the Gaget Dude Wanna talk? • Contribs 12:32, June 4, 2010 (UTC)
Exuse me? That was quite rude GGD. I'm not gonna vote at all now. Ozone101 Talk 2 Meh! 23:59, June 4, 2010 (UTC)

Sonic the Hedgehog, he has done something really really good: made the Club Penguin News blogs, designed the main page, introduced amboxes and more! --Tigernose Tigernose Chat • Edits 21:13, June 4, 2010 (UTC)

so? --Zapwire (talk/blog/edits) 23:47, June 11, 2010 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.
Advertisement