Talk: CPFW Beseechment

Chat

* [14 Jan] <Leekduck> Yah but Il Duce wont let me vote
   * [14 Jan] ... Yes i do
   * [14 Jan] <Wompus78> I have permission to add your vote in.
   * [14 Jan] <Leekduck> mkay
   * [14 Jan] <Wompus78> gtg do homework. Bye.
   * [14 Jan] <Leekduck> bai
   * [14 Jan] <Mectrixctic> @Leek- It's seawhoresdrooler lawl
   * [16:21] <Iamred1> Hai
   * [16:22] <Wompus78> Hello.
   * [16:23] ... Don't forget to vote.
   * [16:26] ... Need 7 more votes to win.
   * [16:26] ... Well, to draw I mean.
   * [16:34] ... <CENSORED>, Flat Stanley voted for us.
   * [16:35] ... I left a message on his talk page for a joke...
   * [16:43] <Iamred1> I AM TALKING TO A WALRUS ON XAT! FOR. TEH. LULZ.

Um[]

Why are Iamred and Catzip's votes removed? Also, leek should be able to vote.

My Vote[]

I vote option 2. -- Firmato per Il Dirigente Conversazione verso Il Dirigente 22:02, January 15, 2010 (UTC)

why was this removed?[]

Reasons why the Un Club Penguin Wiki deserves to be advertised just as much as the fanon:

Satire and fanon are just as important as each other.

Un Club Penguin shares more articles with CPW than CPFW does

Unlike the fanon wiki, Un-CP users have never shunned the Club Penguin Wiki for months on end.

The Un Club Penguin Wiki is dying and needs a lot of help.

Vandals who vandalise here simply due to their dislike of Club Penguin could simply be redirected to the Un CP.

It may be inappropriate to some, but there is a warning page and several warnings while you're at it there.

My wiki My Lulz My talk 22:53, January 16, 2010 (UTC)

I've seen magazines far worse than the Un-CP. In the local Wal-Mart. Where children can easily see it. --Zapwire 23:46, January 16, 2010 (UTC)

Still it's inpporiate! It shouldn't be allowed!Europea^{I am so bored right now.......} 15:28, January 17, 2010 (UTC)

FRAUD![]

FRAUD!

There are shady practices in this vote. You extended the vote without any reason. It was due to close Saturday. You also removed people's votes just because they "didn't come here". That sickens me. Your hypocracy sickens me. You hold the ballot sacrasanct, then you rig it.

Why did you extend it? Is it because Option One won when you wanted your precious Un-CP advertised? There were enough votes and a due date. You have failed to hold up to your bargain, and I will shout your hypocracy to the heavens.

Look how Anniemoose's vote is removed! See how Tigernose laughs at her!

Look here! You even removed your own Un-CP cronies! This undemocratic ballot adjusting disgusts me.

I'm going to revert it all back to the due date and enact whatever wins, even if it IS the Un-CP. I will RESPECT what won without being a sickening hypocrite. I myself will write the winner into the Sidebar, even if I must include Un-CP myself. Don't sugar-coat it, either. You exetended the Ballot simply because your choice didn't win.

This reminds me of elections in Iran and Afgahnistan. Your undemocratic practices disgust me. I'm a DICTATOR, and it disgusts me. This is a new low. To think, I wrote a letter of acceptance regarding your regime AND I gave you an award. Ugh!

--† This is Serious Business! Jesus Loves You and Died for You!! † :) :) ^{TurtleShroom Productions: Patent Pending.} † 16:10, January 17, 2010 (UTC)

Um... Annie and Moose are my dogs... I'm a boy... --Anniemoose98, Club Penguin Fanon Sysop, on CPW 12:26, January 24, 2010 (UTC)

I extended because at 9:30 of saturday there was a tie (13-13). Now, option 2 was winning with 15-12. And the official reason they gave to Anniemoose removal was the she had no edits here. I don't know, but even with her vote valid option 2 still wins. Since you added the links to the sidebar, I shall close the vote Dancing Penguin 16:59, January 17, 2010 (UTC)

Again jumping to conclusions. Okay, Dancing Penguin if I recall correctly, deleted the original and revived it with another forum that had the same idea but restarted the vote. Then I reverted it and extended the original vote to Sunday 8pm (which hasn't come yet) because it was a tie. I removed Anniemoose's vote, for a couple of reasons. You've probably not heard, but our common rules and discussions in IRC have caused a makeshift rule that nobody from other wikis can vote in our forums, even if said wiki is involved in it, on certain circumstances:

CP Wiki didn't advertise your congress forum about including us in your sidebar did you?
A vote policy has been created yet, but not added to the policy yet. Safe to say we have had a few for votes on IRC but not been officialised. Therefore, we've been using those rules to enforce stuff here.

Now, TS reverted it all back to older version with the different choices. UNCP was winning (not because it was rigged, but because I and some others voted for it in the eleventh hour), but TS reverted it back to yesterday's version which therefore doesn't make the vote extended. Funny this, we agreed to extend this until today evening, but TS goes forth anyway.

Also, we didn't extend the ballot because our choice didn't win, because it was a TIE.

So my last words are: stop jumping to conclusions. I had the right to extend it, it was a tie and if it's a tie then there's no winner, which makes no logical sense does it TS? We'll see who wins this evening. Oh and then we'll have a short discussion on IRC regarding the inclusion of a "Related Wikis" sub-menu, so it doesn't make the sidebar all messy. So no touchy until the discussion. --Tigernose Chat • Edits 17:07, January 17, 2010 (UTC)

Oh and I understand why TS is calling me a fraud: because he was being pre-assumptious and never looked at why I extended the vote. I'm not going to express everything in an edit summary am I? And also, I laughed at Anniemoose because she claimed that she was goign to report me to online BOBmasters (we don't have any here... at all, and I'm an admin anyway which is the equivalent of a so-called BOBmaster I suppose) and I was going to get permabanned at Fanon. It's just being naive that was, how can I get permabanned at Fanon (a different wiki), for removing someone's vote which causes nothing anyway. By the way, all you Fanon guys, it's win-win for you, you're still going to be on the sidebar... --Tigernose

Chat • Edits 17:10, January 17, 2010 (UTC)

Remember: if Un-CP gets on, that opnion automatically includes you. It's a win-win for you, but Un-CP wants some help too. --Zapwire 17:34, January 17, 2010 (UTC)

I think we should close now and let both links be there before there's a whole war about this... Dancing Penguin 17:36, January 17, 2010 (UTC)

Yep, Zapwire said the truth, it's win-win for Fanon so stop complaining. Also, Dancing Penguin, one of the reasons why I'm extending is because we need time for the admins to decide if we should have a related wikis sub-menu and where. A sub-menu is needed, but in the community section or underneath Recent Changes? --Tigernose Chat • Edits 17:43, January 17, 2010 (UTC)

Ok, but I think we should close the vote right now so that there is no more controversy and we move to that particular discussion. Dancing Penguin 17:52, January 17, 2010 (UTC)

But if there is a last minute change and Fanon is exclusive on the spotlight. Let it reach it's end then we'll see. --Tigernose Chat • Edits 18:24, January 17, 2010 (UTC)